On Thursday 26 October 2006 3:32 pm, Bo Peng wrote:
> > Regarding the .C issue, although I don't like them, I think that we
> > should postpone this to 1.6.
>
> I respect your decision, but please be more specific. Will this happen
> immediately after 1.5.x is released so that 1.5.x and 1.6/trunk have
> the same file extension? (Or you mean 1.6.x and 1.7?)

  My proposal is to do it as soon as the xml patch goes in. At the same time 
we should rename the files according to their contents and be consistent in 
the naming.

  Example, do you know where to get Features?

  LaTeXFeatures.[Ch]

  And so on...

  I know that we are talking about different issues, but doing it at once will 
only helps us later. Doing it after the insertion of xml patch means that we 
are in full development so going away codewise from 1.5.x is OK.

> Bo

-- 
José Abílio

Reply via email to