On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:03:03PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> "There is no such thing as a valid naked pointer."
> |
> | Tell the people who implement boost:: or std::vector
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:03:03PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> "There is no such thing as a valid naked pointer."
>
| Tell the people who implement boost:: or std::vector<>.
>
| Anyway, I think it's that time of the year again when it's better t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> You already did, you forgot to initialize it.
>> (and we have done that mistake in a lot of other places as well earlier)
>
| I can write invalid code with boost::smart_ptrs too you kno
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:03:03PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "There is no such thing as a valid naked pointer."
Tell the people who implement boost:: or std::vector<>.
Anyway, I think it's that time of the year again when it's better to leave
lyx-devel alone.
Things are broken by arbit
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You already did, you forgot to initialize it.
> (and we have done that mistake in a lot of other places as well earlier)
I can write invalid code with boost::smart_ptrs too you know.
> | I would say that this is a
> | perfectly v
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:58:57PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> There's no need to make things complicated just for the sake of making things
>> complicated. There has to be a real reason too...
>
| But making things complicated ranks high as a real r
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 2:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> But do we like all these bald pointers?
>>
>> void ControlMath::showDaughter(void * key)
>> {
>> Store::iterator it = daughters_.find(key);
>> weak_ptr new_active =
>>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:58:57PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> There's no need to make things complicated just for the sake of making things
> complicated. There has to be a real reason too...
But making things complicated ranks high as a real reason...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 2:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But do we like all these bald pointers?
>
> void ControlMath::showDaughter(void * key)
> {
> Store::iterator it = daughters_.find(key);
> weak_ptr new_active =
> (it == daughters_.end()) ? 0 : it->second;
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 12:43 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 am, John Levon wrote:
>> | > but I can reproduce your math crash
>> |
>> | Which also has a silly caus
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 12:43 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 am, John Levon wrote:
> | > but I can reproduce your math crash
> |
> | Which also has a silly cause (although I can't reproduce it.) Bet it's
> | fi
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 am, John Levon wrote:
| > but I can reproduce your math crash
|
| Which also has a silly cause (although I can't reproduce it.) Bet it's fixed
| by this though:
|
| ControlMath::ControlMath(LyXView & lv, Dialogs & d
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 am, John Levon wrote:
> but I can reproduce your math crash
Which also has a silly cause (although I can't reproduce it.) Bet it's fixed
by this though:
ControlMath::ControlMath(LyXView & lv, Dialogs & d)
- : ControlDialogBD(lv, d)
+ : ControlDialo
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:28:20PM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> the segfault on file->new file->save just went away as of the last
that was a silly
but I can reproduce your math crash
john
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 21:40, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 November 2002 10:59 am, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Open the math panel.
> >
> > Click a button.
> >
> > *BOOM*
> >
> > segfault
>
> I do not see this at all, so it's going to be hard to fix your problem unless
> y
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:29:33PM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Wassup wit all these segfaults in the CVS as of about yesterday???
seems the boost update screwed us over
> Never before has an editor segfaulted and left me get back in just
> seconds to the exact character I was editing =)
The
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 10:59 am, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Open the math panel.
>
> Click a button.
>
> *BOOM*
>
> segfault
I do not see this at all, so it's going to be hard to fix your problem unless
you supply something useful like a backtrace
gdb lyx
gdb> bt
gdb> up
> Was
17 matches
Mail list logo
