Helge Hafting wrote:
> Why? An old LyX will open files created with the new
> LyX just fine - because the .lyx file don't differentiate
> between the wrapfig and floatflt latex packages.
>
> The .lyx file format just specifies a "wrapped figure",
> which either of these packages implement.
But the
On Friday 07 September 2007 15:40:54 Helge Hafting wrote:
> If you still need a version change (for political reasons?)
> please give me a hint on how I change the file format
> and add the do-nothing-at-all conversion. I can then add
> that to my wrapfig patch.
The point that has been raised is
Richard Heck wrote:
> Would you need one if you DIDN'T change the \begin -- \end commands?
I would say yes. You never know how different the output might be. If we
detect a fundamental difference in advance, we cannot do anything if we don't
have a format change.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
It is easy enough to make a patch that simply replaces
floatflt with wrapfig, by changing the \usepackage
as well as the \begin -- \end commands that LyX outputs.
Would that be an acceptable starting point?
I think this can be done without chan
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
It is easy enough to make a patch that simply replaces
floatflt with wrapfig, by changing the \usepackage
as well as the \begin -- \end commands that LyX outputs.
Would that be an acceptable starting point?
I think this can be done without chan
Helge Hafting wrote:
> It is easy enough to make a patch that simply replaces
> floatflt with wrapfig, by changing the \usepackage
> as well as the \begin -- \end commands that LyX outputs.
>
> Would that be an acceptable starting point?
>
> I think this can be done without changing the file format
