On Saturday 13 April 2013 16:37:55 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> facepalm.jpg
By using a polar bear instead of a cat you have spoken to my heart. ;-)
Cheers,
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 13 April 2013 16:53:42 Richard Heck wrote:
> Isn't there some "import __future__" thing we can use to make this easy?
> Or is that what is only in 2.7?
>
> Richard
python 2.7 supports both "from future import " as well as new features that
were backported from python 3 (specific
José Matos wrote:
> Oh, BTW and then if we go with python 3.x we can call the next version lyx
> 3.0. :-D
> Or we can already adopt the firefox convention and go with lyx-3.0 for new
> release. :-)
195.113.26.193/~sanda/facepalm.jpg :D
On Saturday 13 April 2013 11:36:18 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > In the mean time it is possible to use the features of python 2.7 that
> > allow an easy update to python 3.3.
>
> I hope we already at least support python 2.7, cause what I see in
> changelogs, Uwe already ships it i
On 04/13/2013 02:09 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Friday 12 April 2013 18:09:02 Pavel Sanda wrote:
I thought we want to be >3.0 compatible and ditch 2.x series completely(?).
Otherwise it looks like just maintenace burden without profit.
What's the status of python 3 on fedora/debian/suse?
Pavel
I
José Matos wrote:
> In the mean time it is possible to use the features of python 2.7 that allow
> an easy update to python 3.3.
I hope we already at least support python 2.7, cause what I see in changelogs,
Uwe already ships it in Win version :)
> Note that even if we go python 3 we should set
On Friday 12 April 2013 18:09:02 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I thought we want to be >3.0 compatible and ditch 2.x series completely(?).
> Otherwise it looks like just maintenace burden without profit.
>
> What's the status of python 3 on fedora/debian/suse?
>
> Pavel
In the mean time it is possible to
On 2013-04-13, Georg Baum wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> > What's the status of python 3 on fedora/debian/suse?
>>> On my Mac (latest version Mac OS X 10.8.3) the default is 2.7.2.
>> Default is not so important, important is 3.x availability, we have
>> mostly working sel
Georg Baum wrote:
> 3.2.1 is available in debian squeeze (the current stable version).
Wrong, it is 3.1.3, but does not matter.
Georg
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> > What's the status of python 3 on fedora/debian/suse?
>>
>> On my Mac (latest version Mac OS X 10.8.3) the default is 2.7.2.
>
> Default is not so important, important is 3.x availability, we have
> mostly working selection mechanism thanks to Enrico.
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > What's the status of python 3 on fedora/debian/suse?
>
> On my Mac (latest version Mac OS X 10.8.3) the default is 2.7.2.
Default is not so important, important is 3.x availability, we have
mostly working selection mechanism thanks to Enrico.
Pavel
Op 13-04-13 03:09, Pavel Sanda schreef:
José Matos wrote:
So these are the facts. The question then is how do we want to proceed?
I thought we want to be >3.0 compatible and ditch 2.x series completely(?).
Otherwise it looks like just maintenace burden without profit.
What's the status of pyt
Am 13.04.2013 um 03:09 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> José Matos wrote:
>> So these are the facts. The question then is how do we want to proceed?
>
> I thought we want to be >3.0 compatible and ditch 2.x series completely(?).
> Otherwise it looks like just maintenace burden without profit.
>
> What's
José Matos wrote:
> So these are the facts. The question then is how do we want to proceed?
I thought we want to be >3.0 compatible and ditch 2.x series completely(?).
Otherwise it looks like just maintenace burden without profit.
What's the status of python 3 on fedora/debian/suse?
Pavel
On Friday 12 April 2013 12:35:57 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> You are the pythonist here
> P
:-)
The issue is what is the minimum version of python that we want to support. If
we decide to stay with python 2 as the default version the question then
becomes what is the minimum version we want to suppor
José Matos wrote:
> Are we there at that point?
You are the pythonist here :)
P
On Thursday 11 April 2013 10:59:47 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I think that long term solution was rather to switch to Python 3.
> But all such talk is cheap, we need patches
> Pavel
The first step is to raise the supported python to version 2.7 and then the
transition will be easy. That was the whole
Guenter Milde wrote:
> As a long-term project, I suggest making the Python scripts run with both,
> Python 2.x and 3.x (with x some decent choice of not-too-old versions).
I think that long term solution was rather to switch to Python 3.
But all such talk is cheap, we need patches :)
Pavel
On 2013-04-11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:10:48AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
As a long-term project, I suggest making the Python scripts run with both,
Python 2.x and 3.x (with x some decent choice of not-too-old versions).
For simple modules, this
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:10:48AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > 2) Every time Systemcall::startscript() is called with a command starting
> > >exactly as "python -tt", the "python" string is replaced with the name
> > >of the "go
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:10:48AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > 2) Every time Systemcall::startscript() is called with a command starting
> >exactly as "python -tt", the "python" string is replaced with the name
> >of the "good" python, e.g., "python -tt" -> "py
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> 2) Every time Systemcall::startscript() is called with a command starting
>exactly as "python -tt", the "python" string is replaced with the name
>of the "good" python, e.g., "python -tt" -> "python2.6.8 -tt".
Yep, but there are parts of code like preview machine
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:44:49PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico,
>
> what is the status of the python 2 detection you committed some time ago?
> Is it just supposed to be fallback in order to avoid worst things or
> is lyx supposed to work on systems with both 2.6 & 3.x pythons?
It is supp
23 matches
Mail list logo
