> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Yes, we do for several reasons. We don't want to parse the
José> same file over and over again. This file is generated from
José> another python script that parses lib/languages and
José> lib/encondings.
If it is auto-generated, I gue
On Sunday 06 August 2006 19:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose'> Hi, the following patch adds support for a fictitious file
> Jose'> format called 249 which has the property that file encoding is
> Jose'> utf-8.
>
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Hi, the following patch adds support for a fictitious file
Jose'> format called 249 which has the property that file encoding is
Jose'> utf-8.
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+lang = {'afrikaans': ['afrikaans', 'Afrikaans', 'false', 'iso8859-1', '
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 03 August 2006 15:11, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > [...]
| >
| > | When I referred before I was talking about using ucs-4 and ucs-2 for
| > | the external format.
| >
| > That has never been an
On Thursday 03 August 2006 15:11, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | When I referred before I was talking about using ucs-4 and ucs-2 for
> | the external format.
>
> That has never been an option.
So what about uft-16? ;-)
> | I propose to
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| When I referred before I was talking about using ucs-4 and ucs-2 for the
| external format.
That has never been an option.
| I propose to leave the inputencoding in the file. After all xml allows it
| there, so why should not we?
We should
On Thursday 03 August 2006 14:44, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Right. The internal format (which will be ucs-4, unless somehting
> happens) has little or nothing to do with the external format.
I know and that is how it work in python as well, the internal
representation is ucs-4. Not that I ca
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 03 August 2006 14:26, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > IMHO we should drop \inputencoding from the fileformat when moving to
| > utf-8, it is not as if you have a choice...
|
| Such as it is the code supports ucs-4 and ucs-2, but I think that
On Thursday 03 August 2006 14:26, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> IMHO we should drop \inputencoding from the fileformat when moving to
> utf-8, it is not as if you have a choice...
Such as it is the code supports ucs-4 and ucs-2, but I think that I agree
that we can use utf-8 as the ("de facto")
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: lyx_1_5.py
| ===
| --- lyx_1_5.py(revision 14537)
| +++ lyx_1_5.py(working copy)
| @@ -216,6 +216,15 @@
| i = i + 1
|
|
| +def convert_utf8(document):
| +
10 matches
Mail list logo
