On Thursday 03 August 2006 15:11, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > | When I referred before I was talking about using ucs-4 and ucs-2 for > | the external format. > > That has never been an option.
So what about uft-16? ;-) > | I propose to leave the inputencoding in the file. After all xml allows > | it there, so why should not we? > > We should take it away. When we go to xml we will have it as a xml > header. (Leave it for now... but we must remove all possibility of > setting it from inside LyX) I agree. > -- > Lgb -- José Abílio
