Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Like I said before, No. ;-) If I ever do need it, I can always Angus> put it in cheaders locally. In general, you're right; mess with Angus> these files to fix your own distributions idiosyncracies and Angus> you'll break someone e

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Angus Leeming wrote: > > paradlg.C by way of support/lstrings.h > > > > John had forgotten to #include "config.h" in this file, so I was finding > > a whole heap of errors in sstream! I cleaned them up, then discovered > > that they'd g

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Angus Leeming wrote: > paradlg.C by way of support/lstrings.h > > John had forgotten to #include "config.h" in this file, so I was finding a > whole heap of errors in sstream! I cleaned them up, then discovered that > they'd go away if I #included "config.h", so undid my c

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> John had forgotten to #include "config.h" in this file, so I > Angus> was finding a whole heap of errors in sstream! I cleaned them > Angus> up, then discovered that they'd go a

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> John had forgotten to #include "config.h" in this file, so I Angus> was finding a whole heap of errors in sstream! I cleaned them Angus> up, then discovered that they'd go away if I #included Angus> "config.h", so undid my changes

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Fine. I appear not to have on my machine. I can > An

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Angus> Fine. I appear not to have on my machine. I can Angus> always add it locally to cheaders. >> And why do you

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Fine. I appear not to have on my machine. I can > Angus> always add it locally to cheaders. > > And why do you need to compile sstream? One of the files in the kde frontend us

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Fine. I appear not to have on my machine. I can Angus> always add it locally to cheaders. And why do you need to compile sstream? JMarc

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Three patches that use references rather than pointers. > Angus> Cleaner, neater and safer! (All calls to relevant functions now > Angus> pass (*this) rather than (this). No fun

Re: PATCH references not pointers

2000-10-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Three patches that use references rather than pointers. Angus> Cleaner, neater and safer! (All calls to relevant functions now Angus> pass (*this) rather than (this). No function is called in any Angus> other way, so the pointer ca