Re: New Chktex.C patch.

2006-03-24 Thread John McCabe-Dansted
How much of the patch do you want? It does a number of things: a) Removes the USE_BOOST_FORMAT, which makes the code a little simpler. b) Changes the input format format -v0 to -v2, which improved the legibility of the errors with regard to raw use of ChkTex. No longer needed if using ChkTex via

Re: New Chktex.C patch.

2006-03-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"John C. McCabe-Dansted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | - Removes the USE_BOOST_FORMAT #ifdef, and always uses the std C++ code which | is simpler anyway. This last one is not quite ok. We use gettext for translation (_()) and to make it not too hard for translators we must keep sentences, long

Re: New Chktex.C patch.

2006-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John C McCabe-Dansted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> I have been playing with Chktex.C, and have made a patch against John> lyx1.4.0pre3/Chktex.C which: Could you provide a unified diff (diff -u)? It is easier to read. John> - Drops the -v0 flag and uses the less cryptic defa