On Jan 23, 2013, at 8:40 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 19, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>
>>> Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 um 16:37:11, schrieb Jerry
>>>
^
/Applications/Words/LyX_outer_folder/lyx-git/lyx/
On Jan 20, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
>> Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 um 16:37:11, schrieb Jerry
>>> ^
>>> /Applications/Words/LyX_outer_folder/lyx-git/lyx/src/insets/InsetTabular.cpp:194:19:
>>> error: call to func
On Jan 19, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 um 16:37:11, schrieb Jerry
> > ^
> > /Applications/Words/LyX_outer_folder/lyx-git/lyx/src/insets/InsetTabular.cpp:194:19:
> > error: call to function 'tostr' that is neither visible in the templa
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 um 16:37:11, schrieb Jerry
> ^
> /Applications/Words/LyX_outer_folder/lyx-git/lyx/src/insets/InsetTabular.cpp:194:19:
> error: call to function 'tostr' that is neither visible in the template
> definition nor found by argument-dependent
> lo
On Jan 18, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013 um 21:21:10, schrieb Jerry
>
> > Thanks for the enlightenment. Same results, of course.
> >
>
> Which results do you mean? The compilation error because of missing clang.hpp?
Yes.
> If yes, try to copy "./bo
Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013 um 21:22:56, schrieb Jerry
> > In master branch we are on 1.49.0 ...
> > Here we provide already clang.hpp.
> > It differs from my installed file, but only in some guards for macro
> > definitions.
> > It should work if we simply copy clang.hpp from master to 2.0.x
Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013 um 21:21:10, schrieb Jerry
> Thanks for the enlightenment. Same results, of course.
>
Which results do you mean? The compilation error because of missing clang.hpp?
If yes, try to copy "./boost/boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp" form the master
tree to
2.0.x tree.
P
On Jan 16, 2013, at 3:02 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013 um 10:20:44, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
> > Le 16/01/2013 09:37, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > > Here, /usr/include/boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp is part of package
> > > libboost1.46-dev. I think, we should
> >
On Jan 16, 2013, at 1:30 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013 um 18:02:30, schrieb Jerry
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > Am Montag, 14. Januar 2013 um 19:51:08, schrieb Jerry
> > >
> > > ...
> > > > Well, I seem to have lost the ability to
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013 um 10:20:44, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 16/01/2013 09:37, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Here, /usr/include/boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp is part of package
> > libboost1.46-dev. I think, we should
> >
> > provide it too?
>
> I think so.
>
> JMarc
In 2.0.x the
Le 16/01/2013 09:37, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Here, /usr/include/boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp is part of package
libboost1.46-dev. I think, we should
provide it too?
I think so.
JMarc
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013 um 18:02:30, schrieb Jerry
>
> [ 10%] Building CXX object
> boost/libs/regex/CMakeFiles/boost_regex.dir/Applications/Words/LyX_outer_folder/lyx-git/lyx/boost/libs/regex/src/cpp_regex_traits.cpp.o
> cd /Applications/Words/LyX_outer_folder/Lyx-dev-app/boost/libs/regex
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013 um 18:02:30, schrieb Jerry
>
> On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Montag, 14. Januar 2013 um 19:51:08, schrieb Jerry
> > ...
> > > Well, I seem to have lost the ability to build anything but master. I've
> > > tried a few things to build 2.0.
On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 14. Januar 2013 um 19:51:08, schrieb Jerry
> ...
> > Well, I seem to have lost the ability to build anything but master. I've
> > tried a few things to build 2.0.0 such as building inside
> > /bla/bla/development/cmake so that CMake
On Jan 15, 2013 1:53 AM, "Kornel Benko" wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 14. Januar 2013 um 09:45:11, schrieb Nico Williams <
n...@cryptonector.com>
>
>
> > You can always git clean.
>
>
>
> Thanks, but ...
>
>
>
> 1.) This is not OK, if you have data which you do not want to be deleted
>
> 2.) This is valid
Am Montag, 14. Januar 2013 um 19:51:08, schrieb Jerry
...
> Well, I seem to have lost the ability to build anything but master. I've
> tried a few things to build 2.0.0 such as building inside
> /bla/bla/development/cmake so that CMakeLists.txt is seen, and making a
> symlink of /bla/bla/develo
Am Montag, 14. Januar 2013 um 09:45:11, schrieb Nico Williams
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Also, does this cmake command pollute my source tree? How can I define a
> >> build tree?
> >
> > I tried to pollute as little as possible, but in general, you are not
> > en
On Jan 13, 2013, at 8:25 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2013, at 6:49 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 13.01.2013 um 14:18 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>>
>>> Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2013 um 19:24:32, schrieb Jerry
>>>
Back on the bisection trail
I'm having more trouble building
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jerry wrote:
> If you are implying complete automation, I have no idea how to make a script
> that scrolls through the User's Guide (my objective test) and measures how
> long it takes.
No, you have to do that part yourself. Well, there are UI macro type
tools
On Jan 14, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>> Also, does this cmake command pollute my source tree? How can I define a
>>> build tree?
>>
>> I tried to pollute as little as possible, but in general, you are not
>> encouraged to call
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Also, does this cmake command pollute my source tree? How can I define a
>> build tree?
>
> I tried to pollute as little as possible, but in general, you are not
> encouraged to call
>
> cmake from the source tree.
You can always git clean.
On Jan 13, 2013, at 6:49 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 13.01.2013 um 14:18 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
>> Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2013 um 19:24:32, schrieb Jerry
>>> Back on the bisection trail
>>>
>>> I'm having more trouble building from source for this bisection.
>>>
>>> When trying to buil
On Jan 13, 2013, at 6:18 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2013 um 19:24:32, schrieb Jerry
> > Back on the bisection trail
> > CMake Error: The following variables are used in this project, but they are
> > set to NOTFOUND.
> > Please set them or make sure they are set and t
Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013 um 21:37:35, schrieb Stephan Witt
> Am 13.01.2013 um 20:56 schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013 um 20:00:37, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> > > CMake Warning:
> > > Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
> > >
> > > LYX_DEBU
Am 13.01.2013 um 20:56 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013 um 20:00:37, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
> > CMake Warning:
> > Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
> >
> > LYX_DEBUG
> >
> >
> > -- Build files have been written to:
> > /Users/stephan/git/ly
Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013 um 20:00:37, schrieb Stephan Witt
> CMake Warning:
> Manually-specified variables were not used by the project:
>
> LYX_DEBUG
>
>
> -- Build files have been written to:
> /Users/stephan/git/lyx20x/development/cmake
I see, but don't understand, what happens he
Am 13.01.2013 um 15:17 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013 um 14:49:04, schrieb Stephan Witt
>
> > >
> > > Create some directory
> > > #mkdir abcd
> > > #cd abcd
> > > #cmake …
> >
> > I do it that way and for trunk this is working. For branch it is not.
>
Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2013 um 14:49:04, schrieb Stephan Witt
> >
> > Create some directory
> > #mkdir abcd
> > #cd abcd
> > #cmake …
>
> I do it that way and for trunk this is working. For branch it is not.
I do it all the time, also for branch.
The only difference is, tha
Am 13.01.2013 um 14:18 schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2013 um 19:24:32, schrieb Jerry
> > Back on the bisection trail
> >
> > I'm having more trouble building from source for this bisection.
> >
> > When trying to build 2.0.0, I got
> >
> > LyX only supports automake 1.8
Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2013 um 19:24:32, schrieb Jerry
> Back on the bisection trail
>
> I'm having more trouble building from source for this bisection.
>
> When trying to build 2.0.0, I got
>
> LyX only supports automake 1.8 to 1.11.
>
> Macports made it easy to roll back from 1.12.5 o
Back on the bisection trail
I'm having more trouble building from source for this bisection.
When trying to build 2.0.0, I got
LyX only supports automake 1.8 to 1.11.
Macports made it easy to roll back from 1.12.5 or the like to some version of
1.11, at which point I got:
LyX only sup
On Jan 9, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Jerry wrote:
> and got a LyX that scrolls "very good"!
Well, that was stupid of me to say because I forgot to check for the misplaced
cursor, which was bad.
I've done some testing on downloaded binaries from lyx.org for
Le 09/01/2013 10:36, Jerry a écrit :
Hmmm I just found this old script laying around and ran it on a
recent master branch:
cd /Applications/Words/LyX_outer_folder/lyx-git/lyx LDFLAGS="-arch
x86_64 -liconv" CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" CPPFLAGS="-arch x86_64"
./autogen.sh ./configure \ --with-x=no \
Am 09.01.2013 um 10:42 schrieb Jerry :
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 09.01.2013 um 10:17 schrieb Jerry :
>>
>>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> What went wrong? Recall that I'm on OS X 10.7.5. I have the following
>>> libraries installed:
On Jan 9, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 09.01.2013 um 10:17 schrieb Jerry :
>
>> On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> What went wrong? Recall that I'm on OS X 10.7.5. I have the following
>> libraries installed:
>>
>>
>> /opt/local/lib/libiconv.2
Am 09.01.2013 um 10:17 schrieb Jerry :
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> What went wrong? Recall that I'm on OS X 10.7.5. I have the following
> libraries installed:
>
>
> /opt/local/lib/libiconv.2.dylib
> /opt/local/lib/libiconv.a
> /opt/local/lib/
On Jan 5, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Jerry wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Since I have probably complained the most about the scrolling problem on OS
> X, I thought I would (finally) try a bisection.
>
> Jerry
Hmmm I just found this old script laying around and ran it on a recent
master branch:
cd /Appl
On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
What went wrong? Recall that I'm on OS X 10.7.5. I have the following
libraries installed:
/opt/local/lib/libiconv.2.dylib
/opt/local/lib/libiconv.a
/opt/local/lib/libiconv.dylib
/opt/local/lib/libiconv.la
>>
On Jan 8, 2013, at 16:03 , Stephan Witt wrote:
> Reading your linker error message I'd say you build LyX with 64bit, but you
> don't have a matching iconv library. That's strange, because your system
> library (in /usr/lib) should at least provide i386 and x86_64.
i had a similar problem and ne
Am 08.01.2013 um 10:30 schrieb Jerry :
> On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 08.01.2013 um 07:17 schrieb Jerry :
>>
>>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Jerry wrote:
>>>
Hi List,
Since I have probably complained the most about the scrolling problem on
OS X,
On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 08.01.2013 um 07:17 schrieb Jerry :
>
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Jerry wrote:
>>
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> Since I have probably complained the most about the scrolling problem on OS
>>> X, I thought I would (finally) try a bisection.
>
Am 08.01.2013 um 10:12 schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Am 08.01.2013 um 09:56 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
>> Le 08/01/2013 07:17, Jerry a écrit :
Do I need to worry about 32-bit versus 64-bit builds? I'm sure this
depends on my Qt libraries which are:
Qt version is 4.8.3_1+qua
Am 08.01.2013 um 09:56 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 08/01/2013 07:17, Jerry a écrit :
>>> Do I need to worry about 32-bit versus 64-bit builds? I'm sure this depends
>>> on my Qt libraries which are:
>>>
>>> Qt version is 4.8.3_1+quartz (via MacPorts). (I also have an older version,
>>>
Le 08/01/2013 07:17, Jerry a écrit :
Do I need to worry about 32-bit versus 64-bit builds? I'm sure this depends on
my Qt libraries which are:
Qt version is 4.8.3_1+quartz (via MacPorts). (I also have an older version,
probably 4.7, that I downloaded as a binary from Nokia or Trolltech. If I d
Am 08.01.2013 um 07:17 schrieb Jerry :
>
> On Jan 5, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Since I have probably complained the most about the scrolling problem on OS
>> X, I thought I would (finally) try a bisection.
>>
>> Here is what I already know based on downloaded binaries
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Since I have probably complained the most about the scrolling problem on OS
>> X, I thought I would (finally) try a bisection.
>>
>> Here is what I already know based on downloaded binari
On Jan 5, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Jerry wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Since I have probably complained the most about the scrolling problem on OS
> X, I thought I would (finally) try a bisection.
>
> Here is what I already know based on downloaded binaries: The problem
> occurred in at least two stages, be
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > SO IN SUMMARY:
> > * How do I update my local repository to perform the above-mentioned two
> > bisections?
>
> git-bisect looks promising.
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Git#toc22
> > * How do I compile?
>
> I build LyX without the libraries from MacPorts. I'm using self co
Am 06.01.2013 um 04:30 schrieb Jerry :
> Hi List,
>
> Since I have probably complained the most about the scrolling problem on OS
> X, I thought I would (finally) try a bisection.
Hi Jerry,
> Here is what I already know based on downloaded binaries: The problem
> occurred in at least two stag
49 matches
Mail list logo
