On Thursday, 6 June 2024 18:01:42 BST Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 04.06.2024 um 12:16 +0100 schrieb John Robert Hudson:
> > Sorry, having installed 2.4, I am still getting the error message in
> > the LaTeX
> > log:
> >
> > Package natbib Warning: There were undefined citations.
>
Am Dienstag, dem 04.06.2024 um 12:16 +0100 schrieb John Robert Hudson:
> Sorry, having installed 2.4, I am still getting the error message in
> the LaTeX
> log:
>
> Package natbib Warning: There were undefined citations.
>
> Package bibtopic Warning: Please (re)run BibTeX on the file(s):
> (bibt
Am Dienstag, dem 06.02.2024 um 20:31 + schrieb John Robert Hudson:
> Using RC~1 and today RC-2 with Multiple bibliographies per section
> set, I get
> a LyX warning that there are undefined citations in all but the first
> section.
> Looking at the LaTeX log, I find:
>
> Package natbib Warni
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:05:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> André has been doing some work on integrating such insetcommand insets into
> the mathed way of doing things. This would give you a much more powerful
> parser of such things for free. Perhaps you might like to ask him for further
On Friday 19 July 2002 1:28 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> How easy/difficult would it be to have the "text before" option working
> with natbib?
>
> I think that it would be nice to have this in 1.3...
A hack is easy. Output to the LyX file something like "before |++| after"
where "|++|" is some hom
On Monday 10 June 2002 9:40 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller writes:
> > R. Lahaye wrote:
> > > Hmmm, if LyX by its own is able to decide whether it needs natbib, then
> > > why do we need a manual checkbox for "use natbib"? Why not using natbib
> > > automagically when needed?
> >
> >
R. Lahaye wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller writes:
> > And how should LyX decide this?
>
> Don't know, but Angus wrote in
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg39253.html :
>
> "It is intended in that we call InsetCitation::validate to ascertain
>whether we need a \usepacka
Juergen Spitzmueller writes:
>
> R. Lahaye wrote:
> > Hmmm, if LyX by its own is able to decide whether it needs natbib, then why
> > do we need a manual checkbox for "use natbib"? Why not using natbib
> > automagically when needed?
>
> And how should LyX decide this?
Don't know, but Angus wrote
R. Lahaye wrote:
> Hmmm, if LyX by its own is able to decide whether it needs natbib, then why
> do we need a manual checkbox for "use natbib"? Why not using natbib
> automagically when needed?
And how should LyX decide this?
Juergen.
Angus Leeming writes:
> On Saturday 08 June 2002 5:29 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >
> > Despite enabling "use natbib" in Document, \usepackage{natbib} is inserted
> > to the preamble only if the user has inserted a citation inset.
>
> It is intended in that we call InsetCitation::validate
On Sunday 09 June 2002 2:25 pm, you wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>I wonder if this is intended, and why:
> >>
> >>Despite enabling "use natbib" in Document, \usepackage{natbib} is
> >> inserted to the preamble only if the user has inserted a citation inset.
> >>This has bugged me while I wante
Angus Leeming wrote:
>>I wonder if this is intended, and why:
>>
>>Despite enabling "use natbib" in Document, \usepackage{natbib} is inserted
>>to the preamble only if the user has inserted a citation inset.
>>This has bugged me while I wanted to create a list of the whole database
>>with a nifty
On Saturday 08 June 2002 5:29 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if this is intended, and why:
>
> Despite enabling "use natbib" in Document, \usepackage{natbib} is inserted
> to the preamble only if the user has inserted a citation inset.
> This has bugged me while I wanted to cre
On Wednesday 24 April 2002 6:19 pm, Mike Ressler wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Monday 22 April 2002 8:12 pm, Mike Ressler wrote:
> > > No problem. As a return favor, could you look at the ProvidesNatbib
> > > patch I sent out Friday? The patch itself is trivial, but you
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 22 April 2002 8:12 pm, Mike Ressler wrote:
> > No problem. As a return favor, could you look at the ProvidesNatbib patch
> > I sent out Friday? The patch itself is trivial, but you might be able to
> > address my question about how "ProvidesNat
On Monday 22 April 2002 8:12 pm, Mike Ressler wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Monday 22 April 2002 11:00 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > This might make you happy...
> > >
> > > If you could test it a little, that'd make me happy too.
>
> Had a few minutes to play with it
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 9:19 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Silence is not approval.
> I want to hear J-M's opinion, since he has look at this case
> earlier...
Fair enough. I just wanted to trigger some response.
Jean-Marc, the patch I submitted yesterday contained a bug that lead to the
oc
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 22 April 2002 10:35 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> On Tuesday 16 April 2002 10:31 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > On Monday 15 April 2002 4:40 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > > I think that the screen label part of the patch is fine, although I've
>>
On Monday 22 April 2002 10:35 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 April 2002 10:31 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Monday 15 April 2002 4:40 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > I think that the screen label part of the patch is fine, although I've
> > > modified it to work with numerical natbib ci
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 10:31 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 15 April 2002 4:40 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I think that the screen label part of the patch is fine, although I've
> > modified it to work with numerical natbib citations and to cache the
> > label.
> >
> > Attached are my re-
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> 3. Most importantly, I want to
Angus> minimise the footprint of any changes I'm making. The current
Angus> patch affects the citation inset only and either works or
Angus> doesn't work.
That makes sense.
Angus> Having said all th
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 1:26 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > All works very well here, but I'd like some volunteer testers please. No
> > testers, no apply...
>
> applied patch but compile breaks down...
I think that this is saying that Buffer::getBibkeyList() is non-const so a
Buffer const * can't
> All works very well here, but I'd like some volunteer testers please. No
> testers, no apply...
applied patch but compile breaks down...
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem
/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c insetcite.C -MT
insetci
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 12:58 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> I have tested this patch pretty thoroughly myself and have
> Angus> decided that it's only real shortcoming is that it results in
> Angus> VERY slow loading of a b
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I have tested this patch pretty thoroughly myself and have
Angus> decided that it's only real shortcoming is that it results in
Angus> VERY slow loading of a buffer. This occurs because we reload
Angus> Buffer::getBibkeyList from a
On Monday 15 April 2002 4:40 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think that the screen label part of the patch is fine, although I've
> modified it to work with numerical natbib citations and to cache the label.
>
> Attached are my re-workings.
[snip]
I have tested this patch pretty thoroughly myself a
On Sunday 14 April 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> a diff which
> - gives wysiwyg natbib labels and standard behaviour
>without natbib.
> - supports the "before" input textfield in the gui
> - fixes another bug with familyName in biblio.C
>
>
> the citation-string looks like:
>
> \citet[..
On Monday 15 April 2002 4:06 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Herbert> a diff which - gives wysiwyg natbib labels and standard
> Herbert> behaviour without natbib. - supports the "before" input
> Herbert> textfield in the gui - fixes
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> a diff which - gives wysiwyg natbib labels and standard
Herbert> behaviour without natbib. - supports the "before" input
Herbert> textfield in the gui - fixes another bug with familyName in
Herbert> biblio.C
Herbert, could you
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 06:40:52PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Integrating all of this, maybe this hybrid solution would work:
>
> Provide a dialog which lists all the packages that the document
> potentially need. For each package, the dialog will say which section
> of CTAN the pa
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:24:29PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>
Here the first natbib is unnecessary, and ilegal.
Also all the commas are wrong, just white space is enough.
>
>
just as Lars said it should be
>
>
>
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:24:29PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > What we need is to have a text file that describes the options for all the
> > latex packages, and using this text file lyx will build GUI dialogs.
>
> Nice idea. Pursuing it further, define the file format! For natbib, this is
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 16:05, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:26:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 July 2001 15:00, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2001 15:44 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > >
> > > > What I mean is that things like sor
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:26:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2001 15:00, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2001 15:44 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> >
> > > What I mean is that things like sort&compress should be supported
> > > from the GUI, and be don
Angus Leeming wrote:
> No, it's easy enough and a nice idea. Keep hassling me.
It will be a pleasure for me ;-)
Jürgen
> A
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 15:00, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2001 15:44 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> > What I mean is that things like sort&compress should be supported
> > from the GUI, and be done through natbib.
>
> Agreed, but do you think that it is possible to su
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 14:44, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> +
> + // natbib.sty
> + if (natbib) {
> + string options("[]");
> + if (params.use_numerical_citations)
> + options.insert(1, "numbers");
> + else
> + o
On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[snip]
>
> mmm... I guess stringstream is not a win in this case.
> or...
[snip]
Hmm if this were all the problems I give you my "Go" now Angus #:OP
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vi
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2001 15:27 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> I meant to say: "natbib or latex default"
>
> Oh yeah, sure, that's fine with me. If I want cite.sty, I'll just add
> it to the preamble.
But note that cite.s
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 12:35, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tuesday 24 July 2001 01:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
> | >
> | > _That_
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 24-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Lars> But we cannot assume that the users will...
> >
> > Lars> - create new doc in LyX - export to LaTeX - hack on that --- can
> > Lars> very well result in the %%%LyX regions changing - import into
> > Lars> LyX --- los
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 01:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
>
> _That_ was a bit premature!
It's been a branch for 6 months! Anyway, I think that all works properly now
and it seems that the only wa
> | Lars, since I'm blaming you for my confusion here (and maybe Jean-Marc
too
> | --- let's spread the muck-spreading around!) would you care to add your
two
> | agora (centimes) here please.
>
> Give me some code to comment on and I'll do so.
Sorry, Lars. Got your national shrapnel mixed u
On 24-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lars> But we cannot assume that the users will...
>
> Lars> - create new doc in LyX - export to LaTeX - hack on that --- can
> Lars> very well result in the %%%LyX regions changing - import into
> Lars> LyX --- lost it...
>
> That's their problem. r
> But we cannot assume that the users will...
>
> - create new doc in LyX
> - export to LaTeX
> - hack on that --- can very well result in the %%%LyX regions changing
> - import into LyX --- lost it...
But that's a good approximation of what happens when a LyX user and a LaTeX
user collaborate
On Monday 23 July 2001 11:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I am against that. The URL thing was added because we use \url in
> >> LyX docs, but it is a bunch of crap (and I can tell that, since I
> >> wrote it
>
> Angus> Grammati
> I am against that. The URL thing was added because we use \url in LyX
> docs, but it is a bunch of crap (and I can tell that, since I wrote it
Grammatical point: "pile of crap" is OK. "Bunch of crap" suggests some
serious pathology!
Angus
On 23-Jul-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> It is done, all known lyx stuff is discarded in the translation...
Great!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/F
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:57:39AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> Well this could be fairly easy! If we could have a %%lyx-produced around
> this stuff it would be easy to skip it in the readback routine, as we KNOW
> that this stuff was produced by LyX and we don't need to interpret it!
>
> BT
On 23-Jul-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
> that people won't be so happy to share with non-LyX users. Then we have
> the problem of how on earth do reimport an exported lyx file?
Well this could be fairly easy! If we could have a %%lyx-produced around
this stuff it would be easy to skip it in the readb
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I'm not against the option of generating a latex code that doesn't use fancy
> packages. However, I'm not sure that the best way is to have a dialog in which
> you can disable each package individually.
> One option is to have a --compatibility flag, namely
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I'm not against the option of generating a latex code that doesn't use fancy
> packages. However, I'm not sure that the best way is to have a dialog in which
> you can disable each package individually.
Why is this not the best way? I suppose it is becaus
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:37:00PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > I don't see why you need to implement a feature which will rarely be used.
> >
> > Because it's fun?
>
> Because people do actually need this and use it now because we assume
> internally that everything is available. Once prope
Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2001 20:29 schrieb Dekel Tsur:
> > And the good design is to have ALL packages in a dialog and be able
> > what LaTeX code I want produce! AND this then should be honored by
> > the LaTeX methods! In this dialog we would have a button to receck
> > the LaTeX packages installe
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 20-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> >> Well what about "Export as LaTeX" functionality???
> >
> > So you want to use lyx on one machine, export to latex, and run latex on a
> > second machine ? Why not do the lyx->latex conversion on the 2nd machine ?
On Friday 20 July 2001 13:54, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> On Friday, 20. July 2001 10:56, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Could you fix this at your end please by playing with fdesign
> > form_citation.fd.
>
> Hello Angus,
>
> I've done this in fdesign and editor. Now it fits almost perfectly into
> t
On Friday, 20. July 2001 10:56, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Could you fix this at your end please by playing with fdesign
> form_citation.fd.
Hello Angus,
I've done this in fdesign and editor. Now it fits almost perfectly into
the "poor man's 800x600 screen". I've attached the diff (no, I won't
cal
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 20-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> >> Well what about "Export as LaTeX" functionality???
> >
> > So you want to use lyx on one machine, export to latex, and run latex on a
> > second machine ? Why not do the lyx->latex conversion on the 2nd machine ?
> > If you really
On 20-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> Well what about "Export as LaTeX" functionality???
>
> So you want to use lyx on one machine, export to latex, and run latex on a
> second machine ? Why not do the lyx->latex conversion on the 2nd machine ?
> If you really need this feature, you can edit the
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:00:32PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 20-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:32:05AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >>
> >> The real reason is, not to, not use it, if you have it, but to use it,
> >> if you don't have it!
> >
> > I still don'
On 20-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:32:05AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>
>> The real reason is, not to, not use it, if you have it, but to use it,
>> if you don't have it!
>
> I still don't understand: how can you use the longtable package if you
> don't have it inst
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:32:05AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> The real reason is, not to, not use it, if you have it, but to use it,
> if you don't have it!
I still don't understand: how can you use the longtable package if you
don't have it installed ?
On Thursday 19 July 2001 19:17, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> On Thursday, 19. July 2001 16:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
> > Angus
>
> Thanks, I got it now ;-)
>
> Looks great! A few comments, though:
>
> - Citation Dialog size is much better now, b
On 20-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> No. The other person should install the necessary packages (and most of the
> packages we use are standard).
Well it's friday, but here is a * very ironic smiley *
>> But the real reason is not to not use it if you have it
>> but to use it if you don't have i
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 09:21:02AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is why you don't want to use longtable (or other
> > packages) if it is available ?
>
> Maybe you have to send the latex-file to someone you know and you know
> he
On 19-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> What I don't understand is why you don't want to use longtable (or other
> packages) if it is available ?
Maybe you have to send the latex-file to someone you know and you know
he has only a minimal LaTeX installation so you exclude some stuff. Could
that be
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Well this is well known and as developer you should have looked at the
> buglist
>> on SourceForge.net ;)
>
> I still think that this was a sly way to get help, but anyway I've played
> further.
#:O)
Well you won't believe it but I know since a long ti
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 02:15:53PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:56:46PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >> What if you don't have all extra super truper latest packages installed on
> >> your actual machine but would like to be able
On Thursday, 19. July 2001 16:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
> Angus
Thanks, I got it now ;-)
Looks great! A few comments, though:
- Citation Dialog size is much better now, but now a little bit too
wide (about 1cm) for 800x600. Well, not really trag
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:50, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Road test to infinite redraws:
> > 1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
> > 2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the
width
>
> Well this is well known and as developer yo
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:50:43PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Road test to infinite redraws:
> > 1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
> > 2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the width
>
> Well this is well known and as
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Road test to infinite redraws:
> 1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
> 2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the width
Well this is well known and as developer you should have looked at the buglist
on SourceForge.net ;)
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:14, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > Think about the alternative - I add a lot of ert into the inset, so it is
drawn off
> > the side, and I can't even read it !
> >
> > Surely we dont really have/want a choice in this circumstance.
>
>
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
>> complaints about this automatic behaviour someone surely doesn't like!
>
> Well it seems like a good suggestion to me because it only affects the users
The only change to the abo
On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
> Think about the alternative - I add a lot of ert into the inset, so it is drawn off
> the side, and I can't even read it !
>
> Surely we dont really have/want a choice in this circumstance.
Well we have already the inset will scroll to the right if the cursor
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:08, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond
the right margin
> > of the workarea ?
>
> Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
> complaints a
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:08:12PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond the right
>margin
> > of the workarea ?
>
> Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
> can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond the right
>margin
> of the workarea ?
Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
complaints about this automatic behaviour someone surely doesn't like!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:21:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
> > the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
>
> I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we w
On Thursday 19 July 2001 12:21, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18. July 2001 19:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Those willing to help save the CVS head repository from contamination
> > with junk code should:
> >
> > cvs checkout -r BRANCH_NATBIB lyx-devel
> >
> > To get natbib support you
On 19-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:56:46PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> What if you don't have all extra super truper latest packages installed on
>> your actual machine but would like to be able to preview at least normal text?
>>
>> Just check of that feature in th
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:56:46PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> What if you don't have all extra super truper latest packages installed on
> your actual machine but would like to be able to preview at least normal text?
>
> Just check of that feature in the dialog, the resulting LaTeX will not u
On Wednesday, 18. July 2001 19:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Those willing to help save the CVS head repository from contamination
> with junk code should:
>
> cvs checkout -r BRANCH_NATBIB lyx-devel
>
> To get natbib support you'll need to set some parameters in the
> Document->Extra tab
> It
On 19-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I still don't understand this.
> For example, what does lyx is supposed to do when you "diable longtable" ?
> Should it forbid you from inserting longtables ? What about longtables which
> were already present in the document ?
>
> If you don't want to use the
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:11:59AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> And the good design is to have ALL packages in a dialog and be able
> >> what LaTeX code I want produce! AND this then should be honored by
> >> the LaTeX methods! In this dialog we would have a button to receck
> >> the La
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > like a math inset would be fine. Maybe that is the model: an inlined ERT
> > box and a "display" ERT box, for longer chunks of LaTeX code.
>
> That's exactly what we plan to do :)
Excellent! Why didn't you just s
On 19-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
> like a math inset would be fine. Maybe that is the model: an inlined ERT
> box and a "display" ERT box, for longer chunks of LaTeX code.
That's exactly what we plan to do :)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
> > This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
> > the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
>
> I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we will change
> the InsetERT to
On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
> This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
> the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we will change
the InsetERT to be inlined. What will NOT happen is that a inlined
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> This info should probably be kept in the document.
>
> JMarc
I think you are right here, but I a few times went through the nightmare
of submitting essentially the same paper to a British journal, an
American journal and a Canadian journal for consideration. Ther
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And the good design is to have ALL packages in a dialog and be able
>> what LaTeX code I want produce! AND this then should be honored by
>> the LaTeX methods! In this dialog we would have a button to receck
>> the LaTeX packages installe
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:05:42PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> And John, clicking on MathPanel Greek killed LyX for me also, so it is
> probably not your xforms.
hmm. I've tried it against an xforms with /definitely/ the right glibc and still
get the problem too. I'll have to see what's going
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:49:45AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > That said, I want to gripe about the 666 insets, since this is the first
>
> yes, everyone has this gripe. Lars and Juergen are doing things to get it nice
> again, but with out re-introducing latex font m
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:49:45AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> That said, I want to gripe about the 666 insets, since this is the first
yes, everyone has this gripe. Lars and Juergen are doing things to get it nice
again, but with out re-introducing latex font mode (something that needs updatin
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I believe that the NATBIB branch is now in a fit state to merge back into
> head. This is now your final chance to try it out before I completely screw
> up the CVS head by rolling the branch back in ;-)
Woo hoo!!! Yes! Grabbed it, compiled it, already
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 03:27:37PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 18-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Currently, LyX does not have a way to tell which packages are
> > installed. This would just need to read back the packages.lst file and
> > have a couple methods to query it. I th
Oh, I forgot: An Edit-.Reconfigure probably wouldn't go amiss, although I'm
not sure that you need to do so...
Angus
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 18:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I believe that the NATBIB branch is now in a fit state to merge back into
> head. This is now your final c
Thanks all for the input. I conclude from it that for the time being my
requirements are:
1. A check box "Use natbib" in the document dialog.
Got that already.
2. A validate method for InsetCitation so that usepackage{natbib} is included
only when required.
To do now.
That's i
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> And the good design is to have ALL packages in a dialog and
Juergen> be able what LaTeX code I want produce! AND this then should
Juergen> be honored by the LaTeX methods! In this dialog we would have
Juergen> a button to recec
On 18-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Currently, LyX does not have a way to tell which packages are
> installed. This would just need to read back the packages.lst file and
> have a couple methods to query it. I thin kthe official way until this
> is done (and well designed) is to have a
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
