On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 01:05:25PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > André has been doing some work on integrating such insetcommand insets into > the mathed way of doing things. This would give you a much more powerful > parser of such things for free. Perhaps you might like to ask him for further > datails.
Work on inset unification is postponed after release of 1.3 or the end of the year or the day Somebody overrules any opposing opinions (of which there are quite a few) - whatever comes first ;-) So it's probably the end of the year... > In any case, you would still need to modify insetcommand to store multiple > options. MathNestInset already can have an arbitrary number of cells, so this would be no technical problem. The first shot at the unified command inset had only a fixed number of cell (three), but the only reason for that was that the current command inset has only three members. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
