Re: Michael's citation bug report

2001-08-20 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 05:42:34PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Well, No! > > That's exactly the point I was making, in effect, the citation dialog is NOT > modeless (your terminology). um, it's not MY terminology ;) but something weird is going on. I was sure I couldn't type into the workar

Re: Michael's citation bug report

2001-08-20 Thread Angus Leeming
Well, No! That's exactly the point I was making, in effect, the citation dialog is NOT modeless (your terminology). By press the Apply button and so setting that pointer to zero, you can move the cursor wherever you wish and any subsequent Apply will occur there. Similarly if the dialog is ope

Re: Michael's citation bug report

2001-08-20 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 03:33:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Don't follow. current the citation dialog is modal. This means I cannot keep it open whilst editing my document; consequently I cannot change cursor position. As a result, the only use for the "Apply" button to create new insets w

Re: Michael's citation bug report

2001-08-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 20 August 2001 15:26, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Unless, of course you can convince me not to! > > but how often does someone introduce two citation insets next to each other rather > than one inset with two citations ? >

Re: Michael's citation bug report

2001-08-20 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Unless, of course you can convince me not to! but how often does someone introduce two citation insets next to each other rather than one inset with two citations ? it would be different matter is citation dialog wasn't modal ! j