Chris Karakas wrote:
> So either the User Guide is NOT GPL, by force of the missing Disclaimer
> as argued above, or if it is, I will have to change from the GFDL to GPL
> if I include some pieces of it in my software...er, documentation.
>
> Is this what the authors of the User Guide intended? Ha
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.03.05 19:05:33:
>
> Chris Karakas wrote:
> >
> > Now the LyX User's Guide does NOT contain the Disclaimer
>
> This can be added. Use a comment environment or a note inset (depending on
> your version of LyX).
>
I know, but the Disclaimer is not
Chris Karakas wrote:
> GPL you say? Now if only someone could assure me that the statement
>
> "GPL is compatible with GFDL"
>
> holds true...sigh. I am afraid, if you take it up to the letter, they are
> NOT.
>
> For a piece of code (say, a .lyx file containing the documentation) to be
> under
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.03.05 16:41:25:
>
> Chris Karakas wrote:
>
> > Am I allowed to do it?
>
> Yes, so long as your licence is compatible with the GPL.
Thanks for answering!
GPL you say? Now if only someone could assure me that the statement
"GPL is compatible with
Chris Karakas wrote:
> Am I allowed to do it?
Yes, so long as your licence is compatible with the GPL.
> Who decides? What is the licence of the LyX User Guide?
GPL. LyX has one licence only ATM.
--
Angus
