> Nobody seems to be actively working on a GTK port as far as I can see...
I'm trying too. Honest! :)
It was chugging along quite nicely until the GUII stuff from sixpack was
commited, then work kinda got crazy. I'm in Michigan now (don't ask, just
wonder :/) and was in Nevada last week.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 08:08:34PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Nobody seems to be actively working on a GTK port as far as I can
> > see...
>
> Oops. What sort of toolkits are in consideration, then? xforms and
> Qt, obviously. Anything else?
*shrug* None that I know of. Except of course
On Tuesday 16 July 2002 7:08 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Nobody seems to be actively working on a GTK port as far as I can
> > see...
>
> Oops. What sort of toolkits are in consideration, then? xforms and
> Qt, obviously. Anything else?
There is a gnome port too. Michael Koziarski keeps addin
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 07:06:07PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Strictly speaking, you are on shaky ground here in case that LyX
> > comes with any third-party GPLed licenced software. In that case,
> > the copyright holders of those software may in
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 07:06:07PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Strictly speaking, you are on shaky ground here in case that LyX
> comes with any third-party GPLed licenced software. In that case,
> the copyright holders of those software may insist that their stuff
> be not combined and redistr
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:26:01PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>
> > But I don't think you are allowed to distribute binaries of your
> > QT-Windows lyx. QT(Windows) is not GPL compatible.
>
> We can extend our xforms exception to Qt too possib
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:26:01PM +0200, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> But I don't think you are allowed to distribute binaries of your QT-Windows
> lyx. QT(Windows) is not GPL compatible.
We can extend our xforms exception to Qt too possibly.
Btw, Matthias Ettrich made a vague offer of a
> But I don't think you are allowed to distribute binaries of your
QT-Windows
> lyx. QT(Windows) is not GPL compatible.
Very true!
However, Trolltech suggests that the GPL license has the option for an
expection on the linkage to non-system libraries with a different license.
This exception has
Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just to show you all that I'm quite content with the Qt2 frontend nearing
> completion, here's a screenshot of 1.3.0 cvs on win32:
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ps28/ruurd/lyx_win32.png
>
> It has been built using qt 2.3.0 non-commercial for windows, M$ Visual
> S
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 08:11:51AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > How hot is too hot?
>
> You crazy lot ! Everyone knows that a temperature above 12 degrees C is
> reason to strip down to no clothes and refuse to do any work in the hope
> of gaining a "tan" !
Sure. And on Saturday nights temperatu
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 04:57:29PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> How hot is too hot?
You crazy lot ! Everyone knows that a temperature above 12 degrees C is
reason to strip down to no clothes and refuse to do any work in the hope
of gaining a "tan" !
Though I did manage to burn my nose at glastonbu
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 08:34:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> > >Actually doing this and testing it out is something for a rainy day
> >
> > Well then we will see it quite fast, I have heard some rumors about
> > the weather in England ;)
>
> Tell me
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 08:34:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >Actually doing this and testing it out is something for a rainy day
>
> Well then we will see it quite fast, I have heard some rumors about
> the weather in England ;)
Tell me about it ! Though actually the last two days have bee
John Levon wrote:
> Actually doing this and testing it out is something for a rainy day
Well then we will see it quite fast, I have heard some rumors about
the weather in England ;)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 07:08:28AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> If people want to do work on OS independence of course, they are more
> than welcome
I have no way of testing the results, and in fact I do not care too much...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 07:23:40AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > There are no X dependencies left. But there are still some OS
> > dependencies on things like fork()
>
> But the primary goal for 1.3 is still toolkit independence?
Yes, but we are actually there now - I can build a fully functi
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:28:52AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Charming. How is GUI independence progressing? Any hope for, say,
> > gdk under Windows?
>
> There are no X dependencies left. But there are still some OS
> dependencies on things like fork()
But the primary goal for 1.3 is still
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 11:51:40PM +0200, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
> It turns out that supplying a name wich contains 'Qt' gets rid of
> 'freeware'. So I guess I'm stuck with 'QtLyX'
Must the name begin with Qt or could that be anywhere?
If so, I'd prefer 'LyX (Qt)' or something similar.
Andre'
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:07:01AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Charming. How is GUI independence progressing? Any hope for, say,
> gdk under Windows?
There are no X dependencies left. But there are still some OS
dependencies on things like fork()
regards
john
--
"Be sure of this, O young
"Ruurd Reitsma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
> > > name for their program (?) are mostly inclined to write programs called
> > > 'freeware'.
> >
> > What a strange assumption.
> >
> > So how does one supply a name then?
> > It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
> > name for their program (?) are mostly inclined to write programs called
> > 'freeware'.
>
> What a strange assumption.
>
> So how does one supply a name then?
>
It turns out that supplying a name wich contains 'Qt' ge
> > It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
> > name for their program (?) are mostly inclined to write programs called
> > 'freeware'.
>
> What a strange assumption.
>
> So how does one supply a name then?
>
Well.I have to find out...
Ruurd
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:26:17PM +0200, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
> It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
> name for their program (?) are mostly inclined to write programs called
> 'freeware'.
What a strange assumption.
So how does one supply a name then?
Andre'
"Andre Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What's that 'freeware' thingy in the window title?
>
> I am not exactly sure that this reflects the situation properly...
It means that Trolltech believes that programmers who forget to supply a
na
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I recall that you suggested that it would be possible to also do away with
> the timer in the ForkedcallController, but I don't believe you elaborated.
I distinctly remember waving my hands !
Anyway we should be able to have a S
On Monday 15 July 2002 4:43 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > It'd be nice to move the spellchecker's interaction with the forked
> > process into Forkedcall. This will need an extension to Forkedcall so
> > that we can interact with a forke
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It'd be nice to move the spellchecker's interaction with the forked process
> into Forkedcall. This will need an extension to Forkedcall so that we can
> interact with a forked process, not just receive notification that it has
>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:39:58PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:03:02PM +0200, Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> > http://www.xs4all.nl/~ps28/ruurd/lyx_win32.png
What's that 'freeware' thingy in the window title?
I am not exactly sure that this reflects the situation properly...
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:03:02PM +0200, Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> just to show you all that I'm quite content with the Qt2 frontend nearing
> completion, here's a screenshot of 1.3.0 cvs on win32:
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ps28/ruurd/lyx_win32.png
That's SO cool !
Excellent stuff !!
john
-
On Monday 15 July 2002 1:40 pm, Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> > > TODO:
> > > -make a proper win32 fork controller
> > The forked controller is only really used by the graphics code at the
> > moment.
> The spellchecker also seems to use fork(); if it's only those two parts of
> lyx, another solutio
> >
> > TODO:
> > -make a proper win32 fork controller
>
> The forked controller is only really used by the graphics code at the
moment.
> In turn, conversion to a loadable format is controlled through a
> LyX-generated shell script. Presumably this will also have to be replaced
by
> some sort of
On Monday 15 July 2002 1:03 pm, Ruurd A. Reitsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just to show you all that I'm quite content with the Qt2 frontend nearing
> completion, here's a screenshot of 1.3.0 cvs on win32:
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ps28/ruurd/lyx_win32.png
>
> It has been built using qt 2.3.0 non-commercia
32 matches
Mail list logo
