Thanks for all explanations, some fog is clearing out slowly...
Out of curiosity, I just created a seemingly polished branch
http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/tommaso/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/features/chat2
which is a rebase of the current features/chat on top of master. Does this look
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 11/11/13 08:03, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > First of all, it wouldn't be necessary to merge with master over and
> > over again. Chances are not that big that master is now interfering
> > with your feature, so don't bother.
>
On 11/11/13 08:03, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> First of all, it wouldn't be necessary to merge with master over and
> over again. Chances are not that big that master is now interfering
> with your feature, so don't bother.
I just realized that the features/chat branch in .git/config has "reba
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 10/11/13 23:51, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > Any hint as to how to restore a sane environment (branch) :-) ?
>
> looking at
>
>
> http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/tommaso/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/features/chat
>
> it seems to m
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 10/11/13 14:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >> Hope it's now all ok and u can see the repo. The feature is in the
> features/chat branch.
> >>
> >> T.
> >>
> > Yes, it works now.
>
> other question/help: now I'm co-editing wi
On 10/11/13 23:51, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Any hint as to how to restore a sane environment (branch) :-) ?
looking at
http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/tommaso/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/features/chat
it seems to me that
1) master on the development/tommaso repo is NOT advancing
2) pat
On 10/11/13 14:37, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Hope it's now all ok and u can see the repo. The feature is in the
>> features/chat branch.
>>
>> T.
>>
> Yes, it works now.
other question/help: now I'm co-editing with Kornel on this repo and branch, so
there's an inter-spacing of commits
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 6-11-2013 22:50:
On 04/11/13 20:44, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15:
On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I can reach the server, but the "ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx" just
hangs forever.
Now I'm on my
On 04/11/13 20:44, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15:
>> On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>>> I can reach the server, but the "ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx"
>>> just hangs forever.
>> Now I'm on my usual connection, but it's still ha
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 2-11-2013 17:15:
On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I can reach the server, but the "ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx" just
hangs forever.
Now I'm on my usual connection, but it's still hanging forever. Any clue of how
to fix this ?
Did you do e
On 30/10/13 03:19, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> I can reach the server, but the "ssh ... setperms developers/tommaso/lyx"
> just hangs forever.
Now I'm on my usual connection, but it's still hanging forever. Any clue of how
to fix this ?
Thx,
T.
On 29/10/13 02:15, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 29/10/13 01:51, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> I was sure to have done that, at least the reading allowed for anyone
>> (gitweb), or perhaps
>> this doesn't allow cloning yet ? I'll add "@all" then, but now ssh seems to
>> be hanging, don't
>> know wh
On 29/10/13 01:51, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> I was sure to have done that, at least the reading allowed for anyone
> (gitweb), or perhaps
> this doesn't allow cloning yet ? I'll add "@all" then, but now ssh seems to
> be hanging, don't
> know why.
Just while we find a way to fix that perms issu
On 28/10/13 20:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26:
>> Perhaps this way others may more easily contribute to the patch/feature, if
>> interested, by committing to this particular repo and branch ?
>
> If you want us to actually try the feature, you nee
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26:
Perhaps this way others may more easily contribute to the patch/feature, if
interested, by committing to this particular repo and branch ?
If you want us to actually try the feature, you need to give read access
to your fellow developers (at least
Tommaso Cucinotta schreef op 26-10-2013 19:26:
I'm trying to fight my laziness in learning git.
Good.
Apparently, I managed to fetch, push and also a bit of hist rewrite (push -f),
however it seems I get seemingly harmless messages like this on git ops:
remote: Traceback (most recent call
Il 11/01/2012 13:08, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
if you intend to work seriously on this what about creating new branch in
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/branches/personal ?
That's not a bad idea, I'm only refrained from the fact that all developers
would be flooded by the non-sense comm
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Just dropped the patch at:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/7964/
if you intend to work seriously on this what about creating new branch in
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/branches/personal ?
pavel
Il 02/01/2012 16:00, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
I'll have a look, thanks. Another immediate question is whether
there's any portable serialization framework already at reach for LyX
(i.e., in terms of dependencies -- e.g., I could identify
boost::serialize::archive & related). That may be us
Il 03/01/2012 08:07, Liviu Andronic ha scritto:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I wanted to share a video, but xvidcap crashes deterministically, so I can't
:-(.
Try [1] instead.
Liviu
[1] http://alternativeto.net/software/gtk-recordmydesktop/
It worked, thanks. Pl
Il 04/01/2012 16:03, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Back to the dark part of the feature, i.e., collisions: if 2 users try to
edit the same paragraph, what would you do ? (note that, as of now, you may
what about some locking for not-read-only lfuns?
I guess you mean "distri
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Back to the dark part of the feature, i.e., collisions: if 2 users try to
> edit the same paragraph, what would you do ? (note that, as of now, you may
what about some locking for not-read-only lfuns?
pavel
Il 03/01/2012 10:08, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
One general comment:
IMO we should have a dedicated proxy server program for this stuff,
i.e. remove all server related code from your patch and put that in a
new daemon tool. This means that this tool could be launched anywhere
on the intern
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Il 02/01/2012 14:54, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
>
>> First comment: please use QTcpSocket and signal/slot connections.
>>
>
> Still pending, I'll convert to QTcpSocket soon.
>
> Please, find attached the 2nd draft/skeleton of this. Cha
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> I wanted to share a video, but xvidcap crashes deterministically, so I can't
> :-(.
>
Try [1] instead.
Liviu
[1] http://alternativeto.net/software/gtk-recordmydesktop/
Il 02/01/2012 14:54, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
First comment: please use QTcpSocket and signal/slot connections.
Still pending, I'll convert to QTcpSocket soon.
Please, find attached the 2nd draft/skeleton of this. Changes:
1) a new BufferView is created for each new connection, all'em are
Il 02/01/2012 18:05, Rob Oakes ha scritto:
To that end, I'd prefer any collaborative writing features to:
1.) Use an existing open source messaging protocol like Jabber (which
means that any XMPP server could be used for collaboration). Passing
information about geometry, actions, etc. seems lik
On 1/2/2012 9:00 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 02/01/2012 16:53, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Unless we buy some server I don't think this will be possible. Maybe
> someone wants to deliver this kind of services for free or not... it
> does not have to be a LyX.org service I guess.
If we're just
On 02/01/2012 17:51, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
But, instead of that, I would use Json format for the LFUN
serialisation/deserialisation and the packet transmission.
You would use JSON format for everything
Indeed, including the .lyx file format :-)
Abdel.
But, instead of that, I would use Json format for the LFUN
serialisation/deserialisation and the packet transmission.
You would use JSON format for everything
Vincent
On 02/01/2012 17:00, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 02/01/2012 16:53, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I'll have a look, thanks. Another immediate question is whether
there's any portable serialization framework already at reach for LyX
(i.e., in terms of dependencies -- e.g., I could identify
boost::ser
On 02/01/2012 17:00, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 02/01/2012 16:53, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
I'll have a look, thanks. Another immediate question is whether
there's any portable serialization framework already at reach for LyX
(i.e., in terms of dependencies -- e.g., I could identify
boost::ser
On 02/01/2012 17:17, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Il 02/01/2012 17:00, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
I have a pending patch that introduces Qt signals in Buffer and
BufferView, I'll try to cleanup and commit that one.
Ok, I don't know what changes will be introduced by this patch of
yours, an
On 02/01/2012 17:04, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Il 02/01/2012 14:47, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
No, not if you create a new BufferView. In this case all mouse
related action needs to be forwarded as well.
what I mean, is that locally I can have no clue (and I should not have
it) about the wi
Il 02/01/2012 17:00, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
I have a pending patch that introduces Qt signals in Buffer and
BufferView, I'll try to cleanup and commit that one.
Ok, I don't know what changes will be introduced by this patch of
yours, anyway, please, drop a message on the list about
On 02/01/2012 16:53, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Il 02/01/2012 14:54, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
This is interesting (but less than you collaboration patch).
nice to hear :-) Btw, in both cases, what is really missing, is a LyX
collaboration server,
i.e., a simple server to be hosted somewher
Il 02/01/2012 14:47, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
No, not if you create a new BufferView. In this case all mouse related
action needs to be forwarded as well.
what I mean, is that locally I can have no clue (and I should not have
it) about the window and view geometry of the remote LyX instan
Il 02/01/2012 14:54, Abdelrazak Younes ha scritto:
This is interesting (but less than you collaboration patch).
nice to hear :-) Btw, in both cases, what is really missing, is a LyX
collaboration server,
i.e., a simple server to be hosted somewhere (e.g., lyx.org ?) through
which registered u
On 27/12/2011 23:06, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Hi all,
I've just realized a small "chat" feature within LyX. If anyone is
interested, have a look at its description and patch here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7964
Any comment is welcome.
This is interesting (but less than you collabora
On 02/01/2012 10:36, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Il 02/01/2012 10:18, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto:
If you want to see just a preliminary hack that kind of works, please,
find it attached.
I forgot to mention: the files in qt4/ are still part of the Chat
capability patch.
For the collaborativ
Il 02/01/2012 10:18, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto:
If you want to see just a preliminary hack that kind of works, please,
find it attached.
I forgot to mention: the files in qt4/ are still part of the Chat
capability patch.
For the collaborative editing, all the affected files are in src/su
Il 28/12/2011 23:23, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto:
Il 28/12/2011 19:31, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
how hard would it be to enhance your patch so collaborate editing of
lyx document is possible?
I thought to this just a little: from my patch, we can merely reuse the
socket set-up and non-blocking
Il 28/12/2011 19:31, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Hi all,
I've just realized a small "chat" feature within LyX. If anyone is
interested, have a look at its description and patch here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7964
Any comment is welcome.
how hard would it be to e
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just realized a small "chat" feature within LyX. If anyone is
> interested, have a look at its description and patch here:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7964
>
> Any comment is welcome.
how hard would it be to enhance your patch so collaborate ed
44 matches
Mail list logo
