On 05.12.2011 15:48, Richard Heck wrote:
On windows7, LyX 2.0.2's scrolling is somehow broken to me. LyX.exe
takes 50% CPU (my machine is dual-core, so 50% CPU is max for many
programs), triggers CPU fan to max, and is very laggy (non smooth).
2.0.1, with both installers (official and Uwe's)
Op 5-12-2011 15:48, Richard Heck schreef:
On windows7, LyX 2.0.2's scrolling is somehow broken to me. LyX.exe
takes 50% CPU (my machine is dual-core, so 50% CPU is max for many
programs), triggers CPU fan to max, and is very laggy (non smooth).
2.0.1, with both installers (official and Uwe'
On windows7, LyX 2.0.2's scrolling is somehow broken to me. LyX.exe
takes 50% CPU (my machine is dual-core, so 50% CPU is max for many
programs), triggers CPU fan to max, and is very laggy (non smooth).
2.0.1, with both installers (official and Uwe's) has no such issue and
scrolls smoothly.
Am 29.11.2011 03:25, schrieb Yihui Xie:
Done: https://github.com/yihui/lyx/raw/master/templates/ctex.lyx
It is in now in branch too.
thanks and regards
Uwe
Done: https://github.com/yihui/lyx/raw/master/templates/ctex.lyx
Thanks!
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 28.11.2011 22:42
Am 28.11.2011 22:42, schrieb Yihui Xie:
I have translated the two notes and put the new version here:
https://github.com/yihui/lyx/raw/master/templates/ctex.lyx
Thanks, it is now in trunk and after lyx 2.0.2 was released also in branch.
For your question in the preamble, yes it looks suspici
Am 27.11.2011 15:49, schrieb Richard Heck:
The LyX 2.0.2 source package has been updated a bit in response to
earlier issues and is again available here:
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know when binaries have been built. Let's try to do the
official release by midweek.
Works fi
I have translated the two notes and put the new version here:
https://github.com/yihui/lyx/raw/master/templates/ctex.lyx
For your question in the preamble, yes it looks suspicious but is
necessary. XeTeX will run into problems for ctex without
\DeclareRobustCommand\nobreakspace{\leavevmode\nobreak
Am 28.11.2011 06:32, schrieb Yihui Xie:
But Uwe is absolutely right -- we do not really need them. It suffices
to only keep the one for article.
Can you please have a look at the template file ctex.lyx? I added some notes there that need to be
translated. I also think that there is some outda
Le 28/11/2011 14:26, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lyx.org> writes:
It would be nice to have a short recipe to reproduce it.
Try this:
- create a short file with plain text into it;
- open lyx-2.0.2;
- open a new file
- perform Insert>File>Plain text...
You sh
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lyx.org> writes:
>
> It would be nice to have a short recipe to reproduce it.
Try this:
- create a short file with plain text into it;
- open lyx-2.0.2;
- open a new file
- perform Insert>File>Plain text...
You should get it...
BTW, it was already present with 2.0.0.
The templates for book and report were added due to the comment here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7495#comment:8
But Uwe is absolutely right -- we do not really need them. It suffices
to only keep the one for article.
Thanks!
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.
It would be nice to have a short recipe to reproduce it.
JMarc
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
"Jean-Pierre Chrétien" a écrit :
Richard Heck comcast.net> writes:
>
>
> The LyX 2.0.2 source package has been updated a bit in response to
> earlier issue
Am 27.11.2011 um 15:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
> The LyX 2.0.2 source package has been updated a bit in response to
> earlier issues and is again available here:
>http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please let me know when binaries have been built. Let's try to do the
> official release by midweek.
On 11/27/2011 10:35 AM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Richard Heck comcast.net> writes:
>
>>
>> The LyX 2.0.2 source package has been updated a bit in response to
>> earlier issues and is again available here:
>> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
>> Please let me know when binaries have been built.
Richard Heck comcast.net> writes:
>
>
> The LyX 2.0.2 source package has been updated a bit in response to
> earlier issues and is again available here:
> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please let me know when binaries have been built. Let's try to do the
> official release by midweek.
Comp
On 11/26/2011 02:41 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 26/11/2011 1:11 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> OK, I thought maybe we had decided that. But now I'm slightly confused,
>> because Stefano was using the 2.0.2 tarball and configure died on him.
>> So we still have the two choices.
>>
>> Richard
>>
>
> I'm
On 26/11/2011 1:11 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
OK, I thought maybe we had decided that. But now I'm slightly confused,
because Stefano was using the 2.0.2 tarball and configure died on him.
So we still have the two choices.
Richard
I'm not sure which two choices you mean.
I think what went wrong
On 11/26/2011 11:36 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 26/11/2011 10:40 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 11/26/2011 09:55 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> the 2.0.2 tarball as of 11/26/2011 does not compile on arch, even
>>> after manually changing the python strings os.ccp and lib/configure.
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:09 AM, stefano franchi
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Julien Rioux
> wrote:
>> On 26/11/2011 11:16 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
> Oops, I forgot. Compiling now, will report
>
> S.
Success. The patched source compiles all right (after manually editing
the os.c
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Julien Rioux
wrote:
> On 26/11/2011 11:16 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>>
>>> patch -p1< 0001-Backport*.patch
>>
>> Hmm, that's exactly what I tried and it didn't work...anyways, it works
>> now.
>>
>>
On 26/11/2011 11:16 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
patch -p1< 0001-Backport*.patch
Hmm, that's exactly what I tried and it didn't work...anyways, it works now.
[stefano@polus lyx-2.0.2]$ patch -p1<
0001-Backport-changes-Julien-made-to-dea
On 26/11/2011 10:40 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/26/2011 09:55 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
Richard,
the 2.0.2 tarball as of 11/26/2011 does not compile on arch, even
after manually changing the python strings os.ccp and lib/configure.py
to python2. It seems to me that configure is not looking
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> patch -p1 < 0001-Backport*.patch
Hmm, that's exactly what I tried and it didn't work...anyways, it works now.
[stefano@polus lyx-2.0.2]$ patch -p1 <
0001-Backport-changes-Julien-made-to-deal-with-Arch-s-use.patch
patching file config/lyxi
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/26/2011 09:55 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> the 2.0.2 tarball as of 11/26/2011 does not compile on arch, even
>> after manually changing the python strings os.ccp and lib/configure.py
>> to python2. It seems to me that co
On 11/26/2011 09:55 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
> Richard,
>
> the 2.0.2 tarball as of 11/26/2011 does not compile on arch, even
> after manually changing the python strings os.ccp and lib/configure.py
> to python2. It seems to me that configure is not looking for a
> python2 executable, as it does
Richard,
the 2.0.2 tarball as of 11/26/2011 does not compile on arch, even
after manually changing the python strings os.ccp and lib/configure.py
to python2. It seems to me that configure is not looking for a
python2 executable, as it does in the trunk version on svn, and
(therefore?) the PYTHON
On 11/26/2011 05:27 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 26.11.2011 11:01, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> On 26.11.2011 02:18, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> On 11/25/2011 04:14 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
For cmake builds with msvc attached patch is needed.
>>> OK, so what is the procedure at this point? I as
On 26.11.2011 11:01, Peter Kümmel wrote:
On 26.11.2011 02:18, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/25/2011 04:14 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
On 25.11.2011 18:49, Richard Heck wrote:
I have put the LyX 2.0.2 tarballs here:
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know if you have any problems, and le
Richard Heck wrote:
> > For cmake builds with msvc attached patch is needed.
>
> OK, so what is the procedure at this point? I assume we should commit
> this and rebuild. Then do I delete the existing 2.0.2 tag and redo it?
> or what?
I would suggest to do this, yes. The tagged SVN snapshot sho
On 26.11.2011 02:18, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/25/2011 04:14 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
On 25.11.2011 18:49, Richard Heck wrote:
I have put the LyX 2.0.2 tarballs here:
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know if you have any problems, and let me know the status
of binaries, too. I'll
On 11/25/2011 05:25 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 25.11.2011 um 18:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
I have put the LyX 2.0.2 tarballs here:
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know if you have any problems, and let me know the status
of binaries, too. I'll plan to do the real release in a few da
On 11/25/2011 02:37 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
I have put the LyX 2.0.2 tarballs here:
  http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know if you have any problems, and let me know the status
It compiles just fine on Xubuntu 10.04 Lucid. No
On 11/25/2011 04:14 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
On 25.11.2011 18:49, Richard Heck wrote:
I have put the LyX 2.0.2 tarballs here:
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know if you have any problems, and let me know the status
of binaries, too. I'll plan to do the real release in a few days,
Am 25.11.2011 um 18:49 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
> I have put the LyX 2.0.2 tarballs here:
>http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please let me know if you have any problems, and let me know the status
> of binaries, too. I'll plan to do the real release in a few days,
> possibly Monday.
It's ok on Ma
On 25.11.2011 18:49, Richard Heck wrote:
I have put the LyX 2.0.2 tarballs here:
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know if you have any problems, and let me know the status
of binaries, too. I'll plan to do the real release in a few days,
possibly Monday.
Richard
For cmake build
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> I have put the LyX 2.0.2 tarballs here:
> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please let me know if you have any problems, and let me know the status
>
It compiles just fine on Xubuntu 10.04 Lucid. No obvious issues.
Liviu
On 11/24/2011 04:23 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
>> I'm planning to do a bit more
>> testing the next couple days, and then I will prepare the release on
>> Friday, assuming there are no issues.
>
> Please postpone it until Monday. Currently branch is not in shape for
> me and I need more time to test.
>
On 11/24/2011 04:23 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 22.11.2011 14:30, schrieb Richard Heck:
>
>> Now that the crash Pavel discovered seems to have been fixed, LyX 2.0.2
>> is once again ready to leave the station.
>
> You broke the string freeze!
>
That was unintended. I'll revert.
Richard
Am 22.11.2011 14:30, schrieb Richard Heck:
Now that the crash Pavel discovered seems to have been fixed, LyX 2.0.2
is once again ready to leave the station.
You broke the string freeze!
Moreover you committed new layout files just before a release. I'm not happy
about that commit.
Have yo t
On 11/23/2011 05:56 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Il 22/11/2011 14:30, Richard Heck ha scritto:
>> Now that the crash Pavel discovered seems to have been fixed, LyX 2.0.2
>> is once again ready to leave the station. I'm planning to do a bit more
>> testing the next couple days, and then I will pre
Il 22/11/2011 14:30, Richard Heck ha scritto:
Now that the crash Pavel discovered seems to have been fixed, LyX 2.0.2
is once again ready to leave the station. I'm planning to do a bit more
testing the next couple days, and then I will prepare the release on
Friday, assuming there are no issues.
Am 25.10.2011 21:08, schrieb Richard Heck:
It has been about two months since the release of 2.0.1, and we have
collected a good number of bug fixes. So I'm intending to freeze strings
in preparation for the next release fairly soon. Please have a look at
the 2.0.2 targeted bugs here:
http://ww
On 10/25/2011 04:17 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
It has been about two months since the release of 2.0.1, and we have
collected a good number of bug fixes. So I'm intending to freeze strings
in preparation for the next release fairly soon. Pleas
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> It has been about two months since the release of 2.0.1, and we have
> collected a good number of bug fixes. So I'm intending to freeze strings
> in preparation for the next release fairly soon. Please have a look at
> the 2.0.2 targeted bug
45 matches
Mail list logo
