On 11/26/2011 02:41 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: > On 26/11/2011 1:11 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> OK, I thought maybe we had decided that. But now I'm slightly confused, >> because Stefano was using the 2.0.2 tarball and configure died on him. >> So we still have the two choices. >> >> Richard >> > > I'm not sure which two choices you mean. > > I think what went wrong is this: There were changes to po files before > you created the tarball. A string remerge was missing. To do a string > remerge requires python 2. That's when it failed on arch linux. When > no string remerge is necessary, there should be no problem to compile > LyX on arch linux. > Hmm. Not sure how that happened. Anyway, I'll produce the next candidate without the python 3 patches, and we'll see how that goes. Maybe I can simulate the situation on my machine as well somehow.
Richard
