On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:54:25PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Since this works with other versions of lyx, should we just let it be?
> (it's probably not a big thing, even though it's annoying)
Yes.
> And if we let it be, should I still submit a bug report for this, or
> skip it?
N
Since this works with other versions of lyx, should we just let it be?
(it's probably not a big thing, even though it's annoying)
And if we let it be, should I still submit a bug report for this, or
skip it?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-790 91 37 http://www.md.kth.se
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:45:55PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:29:00PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > Same result no freeze on my machine.
> >
> > What are you running? (OS, Lyx version?)
>
> SuSE 7.1-7.3 mix, current 1.3.0cvs.
Aehm. 1.2.2cvs that is. Sam
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:30:41PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Deco was not found. Programming error?
> name: 'end'
Yes, that's the missing dot.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:29:00PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Same result no freeze on my machine.
>
> What are you running? (OS, Lyx version?)
SuSE 7.1-7.3 mix, current 1.3.0cvs.
> PS. If you want to, (and you have a vncviewer and a decent connection), I
> could just show you this
> Same result no freeze on my machine.
Oh well... it works with the CVS version...
ludde:reLyX1>lyx-1.3.0cvs eqnarray
Adding /pkg/mdhacks/pkg/lyx/devel/os/share/lyx-1.3.0cvs/xfonts/ to the
font path.
X Error of failed request: 86
Major opcode of failed request: 51 (X_SetFontPath)
Serial nu
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:06:07PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I have no idea (I didn't compile it), but I forgot to start it with debug
> > parameters... so I opened the file with File/Open instead.
>
> ?
>
> My gdb surely has no File/Ope
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:06:07PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I have no idea (I didn't compile it), but I forgot to start it with debug
> parameters... so I opened the file with File/Open instead.
?
My gdb surely has no File/Open item...
> #LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info se
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> Hm, do you have compiled eith debug information? The function parameters
> should show up here as well.
I have no idea (I didn't compile it), but I forgot to start it with debug
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I've never used gdb before, but I managed the following:
Good so far.
> I also tried a command 'bt' to get some info:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #1 0x081ea8f7 in MathGridInset::appendRow ()
> #2 0x081f2e5e in MathHullInset::appendRow
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:10:50PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Do you know of a useful debug switch to get some more info on where the
> > problem occurs?
>
> Start it in the debugger and interupt during the 'freeze'.
>
I've never used gdb
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:10:50PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Do you know of a useful debug switch to get some more info on where the
> problem occurs?
Start it in the debugger and interupt during the 'freeze'.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > Ok, it chokes on the missing . but reads it fairly well nevertheless.
> > > If the '.' is added it "works" insofar as the @{\quad,\quad} is silently
> > > ignored. It does not f
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Ok, it chokes on the missing . but reads it fairly well nevertheless.
> > If the '.' is added it "works" insofar as the @{\quad,\quad} is silently
> > ignored. It does not freeze here.
>
> Hmm... do you mean it doesn't fre
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I'm afraid I don't know what a 'special column' is, but a warning might be
> enough (as long as it doesn't freezes)
This @{\quad,\quad} stuff. This inserts something like ' , ' as "column
separator". Current mathed does
>
> Ok, it chokes on the missing . but reads it fairly well nevertheless.
> If the '.' is added it "works" insofar as the @{\quad,\quad} is silently
> ignored. It does not freeze here.
>
Hmm... do you mean it doesn't freeze even without the missing '.'?
> Maybe we should issue a warning about t
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:37:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > She just used to pressed enter when latex reported an error and it looked
> > ok anyway...
>
> Should be \right. (Including the dot)
>
If you say so.. :-) it produces one
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:19:24PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Using reLyX on this .tex-file
> %
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \begin{document}
>
> \begin{eqnarray}
> \eta = \left
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:37:20AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> She just used to pressed enter when latex reported an error and it looked
> ok anyway...
Should be \right. (Including the dot)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, no
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:19:24PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> There should be something following this \right, shouldn't it?
I don't know... I was helping a friend convert a .tex-document using relyx
and I'm no tex-hacker... (texer? :-)
S
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:19:24PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> \begin{eqnarray}
> \eta = \left\{ \begin{array}{r@{\quad,\quad}1}
> +\eta' & r < 0 \\ -\eta'/10 & r > 0
>\end{array} \right
> \end{eqnarray}
There should be somethin
21 matches
Mail list logo
