On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:34:14AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> My problem is that I have time in June and then only at the end of
> August or September, but don't care too much for me it is entierly
> possible that I will have the same problems next year Jean-Marc had
> this year to attend the m
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's meeting?
> You did not answer that...
>
> [Juergen: June might be a bit early. Lectures end on July 18th, and our
> "room" might get a bit quieter a week or two after that... this would
> mean "around August 1st" which is
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 7:17 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:41:07PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > xforms has a dialog for the mathed label and qt doesn't. I'm
> > trying to initiate a discussion on how best to change that.
>
> Ahem... mathed labels do _not_ use the dial
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:41:07PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> xforms has a dialog for the mathed label and qt doesn't. I'm
> trying to initiate a discussion on how best to change that.
Ahem... mathed labels do _not_ use the dialog stuff in srd/mathed,
mathed simply reacts to LFUN_INSERT_LABEL
On Monday 30 September 2002 7:44 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Monday 30 September 2002 7:21 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
wrote:
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | What do the rest of you think? Lars?
> | >
> | > That if you have
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 30 September 2002 7:21 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | What do the rest of you think? Lars?
| >
| > That if you have this effort to spend, you should spend it on
| > helping the qt stuff.
|
|
On Monday 30 September 2002 7:21 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | What do the rest of you think? Lars?
>
> That if you have this effort to spend, you should spend it on
> helping the qt stuff.
? Experience suggests that we two often talk at cross
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:17:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
| > > Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's meeting?
| > > You did not answer that...
| >
| > I think that it's probably about time that I showed up...
|
| Indeed.
|
| Now
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What do the rest of you think? Lars?
That if you have this effort to spend, you should spend it on helping
the qt stuff.
--
Lgb
On Monday 30 September 2002 6:47 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:33:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > As for labels within mathed --- well personally, I think
> > that André should move his CommandInset into the outside
> > world and we should use that for the labels in 1.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:33:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> As for labels within mathed --- well personally, I think that André
> should move his CommandInset into the outside world and we should use
> that for the labels in 1.3. This code has been working for months
> although few people ha
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:33:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ok, then I'll just commit the label patch once I can see
> cvs.lyx.org. That will give us a proper Qt dialog for non-math
> labels.
And then there will be only one bletcherous askForText user left. Good
stuff.
regards
john
--
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:32:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Now you have the opportunity to state your preferences.
>
> At the moment I'm very flexible since I have no dates in my
> diary for next year yet.
Ok. I'll wait for a few more opinions
> > That does not really matter. Konni
On Monday 30 September 2002 5:59 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> New qt stuff does not really need approval, it is after all qt
> that we are hopeing will catch up.
Ok, then I'll just commit the label patch once I can see
cvs.lyx.org. That will give us a proper Qt dialog for non-math
labels.
On Monday 30 September 2002 6:19 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:17:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's
> > > meeting? You did not answer that...
> >
> > I think that it's probably about time that I showed up...
>
> Inde
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:17:33PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's meeting?
> > You did not answer that...
>
> I think that it's probably about time that I showed up...
Indeed.
Now you have the opportunity to state your preferences.
> ...abe
On Monday 30 September 2002 5:56 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have
> > looked at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and
> > even your comment was somewhat cryptic ;-)
>
> A
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have looked
>> at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and even your
>> comment was somewhat cryptic ;-)
>
| Ok: I have not ac
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have looked
> at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and even your
> comment was somewhat cryptic ;-)
Apropos comments: What about my poll for next year's meeting?
You di
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:44:49PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have looked
> at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and even your
> comment was somewhat cryptic ;-)
Ok: I have not actually tried them, but they look ok.
As they imple
On Monday 30 September 2002 5:25 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> What happened to the patches that have been sent to the list
> lately?
>
> Andre'
Nothing at all as nobody other than you appears to have looked
at them, let alone commented on their quallity (and even your
comment was somewhat cryptic
21 matches
Mail list logo
