> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> There is also a bug that I never filed :) Insert>File is dead
>> broken.
Juergen> In which respect?
I am glad you ask. Look at BufferView::Pimpl::MenuInsertLyXFile. There
it does
b
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> There is also a bug that I never filed :) Insert>File is dead broken.
In which respect?
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> | > Angus> In Python, you can write: unicode(string,'latex+latin1')
> | > Angus> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/252124
> |
> | > Angus> so I guess that we could def
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > Angus> In Python, you can write: unicode(string,'latex+latin1')
| > Angus> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/252124
|
| > Angus> so I guess that we could define a similar converter and pop up
| > Ang
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> In Python, you can write: unicode(string,'latex+latin1')
> Angus> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/252124
> Angus> so I guess that we could define a similar converter and pop up
> Angus> an error box if a character cannot be converted.
>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> In Python, you can write: unicode(string,'latex+latin1')
Angus> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/252124
Angus> so I guess that we could define a similar converter and pop up
Angus> an error box if a character
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Lars> I am currently looking hard at the ICU library, and even if I
Lars> don't like the api super well, I think this will reduce the
Lars> effort we will have to put in tremendously.
The only question I have is: how do we handle the conversion from/to
LaTeX notation?
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I am currently looking hard at the ICU library, and even if I
Lars> don't like the api super well, I think this will reduce the
Lars> effort we will have to put in tremendously.
The only question I have is: how do we handle the
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:45:50PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One other options is to make LyX truly be a Qt app (I am not sure that
> I really like this), and use the Unicode support therein)
I would take a huge burden off our sholders in quite
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I think one year is too much, and we should try to make it happen
>> faster than that. (At least get basic support for Unicode in rather
>> fast and then use some time to refine it)
>>
>> I am currently looking hard at the ICU library, and ev
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think one year is too much, and we should try to make it happen
> faster than that. (At least get basic support for Unicode in rather
> fast and then use some time to refine it)
>
> I am currently looking hard at the ICU library, and even if I don't
> like the api
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am no fan of big branches, neither with CVS nor with SVN. SVN makes
| branching a bit simpler, though.
And way faster... and all merging is way easier. No fiddling with
tags...
| In any case, I support Lars' idea of one big feature per release,
| i.e
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:54:17AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > I'd hope that, by restricting ourselves to only one big feature per
> > release, maintaining the branches will be bearable.
>
> How is that with SVN? Easier?
I am no fan of big branches, neither with CVS nor with SVN. SVN makes
b
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 04 October 2005 08:32, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Sorry for begin so grumpy. I am a bit frustrated that 1.4 never
| > happens and that I have no time to do real work on LyX.
| >
| > Trice will improve I guess.
|
| So, when do you expect
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Hmm. Tried to use, say, pybliographer, with LyX recently? I know
> that I haven't, but I also know that I changed the lfun to insert a
> citation, so would be surprised if it did work...
This is bug 2071 now.
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2071
Jürgen
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Fine. I am pretty sure that Helges problem is some half up to
Georg> date tree, so I'd like to commit this patch. If it turns out
Georg> that it still has problems we can still revert to the old
Georg> behaviour, but since the work has
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 08:32, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Sorry for begin so grumpy. I am a bit frustrated that 1.4 never
> happens and that I have no time to do real work on LyX.
>
> Trice will improve I guess.
So, when do you expect pre2 to be out? That was what I tried to ask several
we
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 16:37, Bo Peng wrote:
> > How is that with SVN? Easier?
> >
> > - Martin
>
> Yes. Much easier. With natural rename, move and many more features,
> version control with SVN is no longer intimidating. I would highly
> recommend that lyx moves to svn after 1.4.0.
That is
> How is that with SVN? Easier?
>
> - Martin
Yes. Much easier. With natural rename, move and many more features,
version control with SVN is no longer intimidating. I would highly
recommend that lyx moves to svn after 1.4.0.
Bo
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 04:18:38PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:26:01PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> >> Yes. The reason is the broken lib/doc/Makefile.am. I wait for the results
> >> of your tests of TOC3.diff :-)
> >
> > Yes. That patch fix
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:26:01PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Yes. The reason is the broken lib/doc/Makefile.am. I wait for the results
>> of your tests of TOC3.diff :-)
>
> Yes. That patch fixes it. It seems fine to me. Using automake-1.9.5
> on Redhat Fedora Core 4.
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:26:01PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > BTW, currently, my daily builds are failing. Has anyone been looking
> > at my messages re: "make rpmdist" failures?
>
> Yes. The reason is the broken lib/doc/Makefile.am. I wait for the results of
> your
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> BTW, currently, my daily builds are failing. Has anyone been looking
> at my messages re: "make rpmdist" failures?
Yes. The reason is the broken lib/doc/Makefile.am. I wait for the results of
your tests of TOC3.diff :-)
Georg
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:11:43AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > I suppose that a binary release would be too much work to support, but
> > from my use of the pmwiki engine (where new updates appear once or twice a
> > week), I've found it very convenient to simply use 'cvs update'.
>
> Kayvan buil
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There are only two critical bugs in bugzilla now, both targeting
>> 1.3.
Juergen> And only two majors (for 1.4), from which for both patches
Juergen> exist (and one is not even a regression).
Juergen> I think after those have
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> I think that we should address the fundamental problem with all
>> this in future work. At the start of the next development cycle, we
>> should have a discussion of what one big feature we want in the
>> next release. We should then allow only changes to HEAD related to
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think the important question is how/if the file format might change from
> 1.4-alpha to 1.4-proper. LyX is *very* highly regarded in my mind because
> I've rarely (if ever!) lost data using it. As a user, *I* wouldn't worry
> too much about spurious crashes and missing
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Hmm. Tried to use, say, pybliographer, with LyX recently?
No.
> I know
> that I haven't, but I also know that I changed the lfun to insert a
> citation, so would be surprised if it did work...
Well, then file a bug report, please :-P
Jürgen
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I think after those have been fixed, and probably after the speedup
> > aims have been reached, you could consider a more public beta.
> >
> > Jürgen
>
> Hmm. Tried to use, say, pybliographer, with LyX recently? I know
> that I haven't, but I also
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 09:38 +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Sorry for begin so grumpy.
>
> You're not grumpy. You're just thirty-something.
>
> > I am a bit frustrated that 1.4 never happens
>
> We bit off far too much in this development cycle IMO.
>
> > and that I
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Sorry for begin so grumpy.
You're not grumpy. You're just thirty-something.
> I am a bit frustrated that 1.4 never happens
We bit off far too much in this development cycle IMO.
> and that I have no time to do real work on LyX.
You're just thirty-something.
> Tri
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> > Sorry for begin so grumpy. I am a bit frustrated that 1.4 never
>> > happens and that I have no time to do real work on LyX.
>>
>> Well yes... 1.4 should really happen soon now. I'm beginning to be
>> hopeful: many ugly bugs fixed, speed is
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Sorry for begin so grumpy. I am a bit frustrated that 1.4 never
> > happens and that I have no time to do real work on LyX.
>
> Well yes... 1.4 should really happen soon now. I'm beginning to be
> hopeful: many ugly bugs fixed, speed is coming up to speed...
I think so, t
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 09:32 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Sorry for begin so grumpy. I am a bit frustrated that 1.4 never
> happens and that I have no time to do real work on LyX.
Well yes... 1.4 should really happen soon now. I'm beginning to be
hopeful: many ugly bugs fixed, speed is comin
34 matches
Mail list logo
