Angus Leeming wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> I think one year is too much, and we should try to make it happen >> faster than that. (At least get basic support for Unicode in rather >> fast and then use some time to refine it) >> >> I am currently looking hard at the ICU library, and even if I don't >> like the api super well, I think this will reduce the effort we will >> have to put in tremendously. >> >> I'd grateful if others also could have a look at ICU. >> http://icu.sourceforge.net/ > > Will do.
Ahhh, this is IBM's library that most everybody who talks about unicode uses as a point of reference. I don't think that we can go far wrong if we use this. -- Angus
