[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I think I know where the source of the problem lies; it is in the
Dekel's patch(summitted on March, 6th) against "qfont_loader.C" in
lyx-1.3.1.
I could confirm this by replacing qfont_loader.C in lyx-1.3.1 by
qfont_loader.C of lyx-1.3.0 and finding the resulting
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Note that he says it used to work fine with an earlier version of
> > Qt-LyX. Has Qt's handling of such things changed since Qt 3.1?
>
> I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
>
No
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Note that he says it used to work fine with an earlier version of
> > Qt-LyX. Has Qt's handling of such things changed since Qt 3.1?
>
> I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
>
No
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The tree is in a state were such work won't get lost.
All the tough stuff has been lost already, I think - that is, the tricky
things concerning insets, cut and paste, tables, etc. are broken to the
extent they need re-doing altog
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:06:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Finally, I feel I'd be wasting my time on the CVS HEAD tree given the
> state it's in, and backporting stuff is tedious and distinctly un-fun
> work.
>
> So yeah, I am. I might get round to fixing change tracking if the tree
> recovers,
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So yeah, I am. I might get round to fixing change tracking if the tree
| recovers, though.
:-) so I won't remove the non-working cruft for some time yet then.
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:37:46PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
>
> Incidentally, what is your current interest level? I have the feeling
> that you're easing down to 'observer status'.
Well I hope I can put this without pissing anybody off in th
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Note that he says it used to work fine with an earlier version of
>> Qt-LyX. Has Qt's handling of such things changed since Qt 3.1?
>
> I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
Incidentally, what is your
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Note that he says it used to work fine with an earlier version of
> Qt-LyX. Has Qt's handling of such things changed since Qt 3.1?
I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twi
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:04:09AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> > recent version of CJK-LyX-qt is CJK-LyX-qt-3.1(lyx-qt-3.1 is
>> > O.K.!).
>>
>> That is usally a symptom of latex-xft package missing. Get the
>> rpm from ftp
>> site and all should work well.
>
> Not ne
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:04:09AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > recent version of CJK-LyX-qt is CJK-LyX-qt-3.1(lyx-qt-3.1 is O.K.!).
>
> That is usally a symptom of latex-xft package missing. Get the rpm from ftp
> site and all should work well.
Not necessarily - in fact, unlikely. Qt will n
On Thursday 16 October 2003 03:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In lyx-qt, greek letters are displayed only in 'TeX' form. That is, the
> Greek 'alpha', for example, is displayed on lyx-screen as
> red-colored "alpha".
>
> I have had this problem since lyx-3.2, and this is the reason why
12 matches
Mail list logo
