Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I remember that we had a request about that. However, replacing all \n
> in the LyX code by some macro that can output \r\n is not something I
> want to do. I am not even not sure of how this is handled by C++.
You could do it at file stream level: Always output the
Am 16.07.2013 um 22:55 schrieb Uwe Stöhr :
> Am 16.07.2013 22:44, schrieb Stephan Witt:
>
>> I don't like your proposal. It'd be a very heavy change.
>
> Only a few kB.
The whole diff would be send to the list per mail.
>> E.g. you can change one place of the tutorial document. It's a file wit
Le 27/06/13 09:34, Stephan Witt a écrit :
So, I conclude the diff was made by the save operation of LyX.
Currently the repository version of the file "lib/doc/de/UserGuide.lyx"
has dos line endings. LyX can read it but it converts it to plain unix
line endings on save. IOW, it saves it with platf
Le 26/06/13 23:15, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Then your Git CR-LF settings are incorrect. It should be "AutoCRLF".
( http://git-scm.com/book/ch7-1.html#Formatting-and-Whitespace )
It is not a matter of having everybody configure his git copies. I see
only two solutions:
1/ stop using OSes that use
Am 16.07.2013 22:44, schrieb Stephan Witt:
I don't like your proposal. It'd be a very heavy change.
Only a few kB.
E.g. you can change one place of the tutorial document. It's a file with Unix
line endings ATM.
What happens after the Save by the LyX app running on Windows?
I did this now
Am 16.07.2013 um 22:30 schrieb Uwe Stöhr :
> Am 27.06.2013 09:34, schrieb Stephan Witt:
>
( http://git-scm.com/book/ch7-1.html#Formatting-and-Whitespace )
>>
>> I don't think this is the problem.
>
> Hmm, OK, then please make commit your version of the German UserGuide. I will
> checkout
Am 27.06.2013 09:34, schrieb Stephan Witt:
( http://git-scm.com/book/ch7-1.html#Formatting-and-Whitespace )
I don't think this is the problem.
Hmm, OK, then please make commit your version of the German UserGuide. I will checkout and commit a
fake change and then we will see.
thanks and r
Am 26.06.2013 um 23:29 schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Am 26.06.2013 um 23:15 schrieb Uwe Stöhr :
>
>> Am 26.06.2013 11:56, schrieb Stephan Witt:
>>
>>> I catched a wrong word in Section 2.1.
>>>
>>> The sentence "Es gibt keinen vertikalen Rollbalken" is wrong.
>>> Obviously it should be "Es gibt kein
Am 26.06.2013 um 23:15 schrieb Uwe Stöhr :
> Am 26.06.2013 11:56, schrieb Stephan Witt:
>
>> I catched a wrong word in Section 2.1.
>>
>> The sentence "Es gibt keinen vertikalen Rollbalken" is wrong.
>> Obviously it should be "Es gibt keinen horizontalen Rollbalken".
>
> Thanks for the report,
Am 26.06.2013 11:56, schrieb Stephan Witt:
I catched a wrong word in Section 2.1.
The sentence "Es gibt keinen vertikalen Rollbalken" is wrong.
Obviously it should be "Es gibt keinen horizontalen Rollbalken".
Thanks for the report, I fixed this now.
I cannot fix it because a change of this
10 matches
Mail list logo