Le 09/02/11 19:02, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 08/02/2011 14:11, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
would you have problem with having
#LyX 1.6 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
Go ahead.
like this.
pavel
Looks good.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 08/02/2011 14:11, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> would you have problem with having
>> #LyX 1.6 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
>
> Go ahead.
like this.
pavel
diff --git a/src/Buffer.cpp b/src/Buffer.cpp
index 4b98221..1c301b4 100644
--- a/src/Bu
Richard Heck wrote:
> I have no objection to this.
Me neither.
Jürgen
Le 08/02/2011 14:11, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
would you have problem with having
#LyX 1.6 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
Go ahead.
JMarc
On 02/08/2011 08:11 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
one of the long-time issues with version-control problems
is that we write in the very begining of the .lyx file
something like:
#LyX 1.6.10svn created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
do you find the number X in 1.6.X important to
On Friday 20 October 2006 13:42, Michael Gerz wrote:
> All LyX versions prior to 1.4 do not support CT at all. I.e. if lyx2lyx
> works correctly for 1.3 <-> 1.4, there may be no need for further
> conversions.
If we go from 1.4 -> 1.3 lyx2lyx removes all CT from the document...
as it should.
--
Georg Baum wrote:
I will commit the patch and see what happens...
Please don't do that before it is clear whether this is a format change or
not.
Too late... CT is broken anyway in 1.5 at the moment.
I will keep this email safely in my folder and check the format change
later. (Promi
Michael Gerz wrote:
> The source code seems to indicate that LyX 1.4 is able to read author
> information no matter whether it is in CT mode or not.
Please test that.
> All LyX versions prior to 1.4 do not support CT at all. I.e. if lyx2lyx
> works correctly for 1.3 <-> 1.4, there may be no need
Georg Baum wrote:
I am too busy right now to work on this, but have one question: Is it really
a format change?
What happens if an older LyX reads in the complete author list?
What happens if a newer LyX reads an older document without the author list?
Assuming it is a format change:
What shou
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Georg, Jose´, all,
>
> I would like to commit the patch below. It stores the complete list of
> authors even if change tracking is not activated. This is needed in
> future because you are allowed to switch off change tracking without
> accepting all existing changes.
>
> A
10 matches
Mail list logo
