Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-11 21:50, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-11 20:28, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Tuesday, 11 August 2020 18.21.12 WEST Daniel wrote: Thanks. So, I guess the ten font-sizes in LyX are pretty LaTeX-centric to begin with. One problem of the latex font size names IMHO is that it mixes logical

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-11 20:28, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Tuesday, 11 August 2020 18.21.12 WEST Daniel wrote: Thanks. So, I guess the ten font-sizes in LyX are pretty LaTeX-centric to begin with. One problem of the latex font size names IMHO is that it mixes logical with physical markups (form vs conte

Re: Font size names

On Tuesday, 11 August 2020 18.21.12 WEST Daniel wrote: > Thanks. So, I guess the ten font-sizes in LyX are pretty LaTeX-centric > to begin with. One problem of the latex font size names IMHO is that it mixes logical with physical markups (form vs content). That is particularly visible in the cho

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-11 17:40, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 15:41, Daniel > wrote: On 2020-08-11 07:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 21:44 +0200 schrieb Daniel: >> Since I always considered LyX to be quite LaTeX-centric, I a

Re: Font size names

On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 15:41, Daniel wrote: > On 2020-08-11 07:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 21:44 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > >> Since I always considered LyX to be quite LaTeX-centric, I am > >> curious > >> > >> what application of LyX there is where one font size st

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-11 07:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 21:44 +0200 schrieb Daniel: Since I always considered LyX to be quite LaTeX-centric, I am curious what application of LyX there is where one font size step down from normal wouldn't be footnote size and still it makes se

Re: Font size names

Am Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:11:57 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > > They are not just internal. For example, "giant" appears in the > > > > customization manual ("footnotesize" and "scriptsize" don't but > > neither do "smaller" and "small

Re: Font size names

Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > They are not just internal. For example, "giant" appears in the > > customization manual ("footnotesize" and "scriptsize" don't but > neither do "smaller" and "smallest", I think it's just an unintended > ommission). Customization is not

Re: Font size names

Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 21:44 +0200 schrieb Daniel: > Since I always considered LyX to be quite LaTeX-centric, I am > curious > > what application of LyX there is where one font size step down from > > normal wouldn't be footnote size and still it makes sense to have > the > > ten differen

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-10 19:28, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 11:14 -0600 schrieb Joel Kulesza: On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:37 AM Kornel Benko wrote: I have not found 'huger' in the dictionary, so Giant is OK for me. But I would drop footnotesize and scriptsize and use smaller+smalle

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-10 17:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 17:06 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: So you are suggesting to do both of those changes, right? No, only the last. No need to change these IMHO. These are just internal representations. They are not just internal. For ex

Re: Font size names

Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 11:14 -0600 schrieb Joel Kulesza: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:37 AM Kornel Benko wrote: > > I have not found 'huger' in the dictionary, so Giant is OK for me. > > But I would drop footnotesize and scriptsize and use > > smaller+smallest and use the GUI > > names here. >

Re: Font size names

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:37 AM Kornel Benko wrote: > > I have not found 'huger' in the dictionary, so Giant is OK for me. > But I would drop footnotesize and scriptsize and use smaller+smallest and > use the GUI > names here. > Would it be too cluttered to have, for example, "smaller (footnotes

Re: Font size names

Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 17:06 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > So you are suggesting to do both of those changes, right? > > No, only the last. No need to change these IMHO. These are just internal representations. On the other points, I strongly agree with Kornel. Jürgen signature.asc Desc

Re: Font size names

Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:09:28 +0200 schrieb Daniel : > On 10/8/20 17:06, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:31:52 +0200 > > schrieb Daniel : > > > >> On 10/8/20 13:51, Kornel Benko wrote: > >>> Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200 > >>> schrieb Daniel : > >>> > On 2020-08-

Re: Font size names

On 10/8/20 17:06, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:31:52 +0200 schrieb Daniel : On 10/8/20 13:51, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel : On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wro

Re: Font size names

Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:31:52 +0200 schrieb Daniel : > On 10/8/20 13:51, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200 > > schrieb Daniel : > > > >> On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote: > >>> On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote: > On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote: > >>

Re: Font size names

On 10/8/20 13:51, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel : On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200 schrieb Daniel : On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko w

Re: Font size names

Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:21:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel : > On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote: > > On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote: > >> On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote: > >>> Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200 > >>> schrieb Daniel : > >>> > On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote:

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-10 12:59, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200 schrieb Daniel : On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel : Attached is a chart of LyX font size

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-10 12:42, Daniel wrote: On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200 schrieb Daniel : On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel : Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightl

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-10 12:08, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200 schrieb Daniel : On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel : Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly confusing that LyX uses two di

Re: Font size names

Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:35 +0200 schrieb Daniel : > On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200 > > schrieb Daniel : > > > >> Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly > >> confusing that LyX uses two different naming schemes

Re: Font size names

On 2020-08-10 09:15, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel : Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly confusing that LyX uses two different naming schemes (in addition to LaTeX)? Maybe some historic reason? If possible, I suggest t

Re: Font size names

Am Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:24:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel : > Attached is a chart of LyX font sizes. Does anyone else find it slightly > confusing that LyX uses two different naming schemes (in addition to > LaTeX)? Maybe some historic reason? If possible, I suggest to go for > only one naming scheme.