Am Montag, den 10.08.2020, 11:14 -0600 schrieb Joel Kulesza: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:37 AM Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: > > I have not found 'huger' in the dictionary, so Giant is OK for me. > > But I would drop footnotesize and scriptsize and use > > smaller+smallest and use the GUI > > names here. > > Would it be too cluttered to have, for example, "smaller > (footnotesize)" and "smallest (scriptsize)" to help users more > familiar with LaTeX understand the outcome? These terms are specific > to LaTeX, but I'm not sure they would confuse non-LaTeX LyX users if > given with the other size labels.
Yes (too cluttered). If you start this, you'll need to add similar elaborations to paragraph styles and other places. This is all too LaTeX-centric. Jürgen > > Thanks, > Joel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
