Re: FINISHED_UP/DOWN/...

2002-07-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:24:26PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Dekel Tsur wrote: > >For RTL I need to have a distinction between FINISHED_LEFT/RIGHT > >and FINISHED_BEFORE/AFTER, so in other words, we will need to have > >6 FINISHED* values. > > Why would you need this? IMO we just need LEFT/RI

Re: FINISHED_UP/DOWN/...

2002-07-15 Thread Juergen Vigna
Dekel Tsur wrote: > For RTL I need to have a distinction between FINISHED_LEFT/RIGHT > and FINISHED_BEFORE/AFTER, so in other words, we will need to have > 6 FINISHED* values. Why would you need this? IMO we just need LEFT/RIGHT (not BEFORE/AFTER) IMO that left/right are in the same direction in

Re: FINISHED_UP/DOWN/...

2002-07-15 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:08:13AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > I would say because there are actions not given by a cursor movement > which will have to move the cursor to the position. Maybe UP is not > one of them but _before_ and _behind_ are needed so I think we should > have all 4 direct

Re: FINISHED_UP/DOWN/...

2002-07-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
Dekel Tsur wrote: > Why do we need FINISHED_UP et al. ? > These are used only when exiting an inset with a cursor key (namely LFUN_UP > et al. is called), so the direction is known according to the action. > So, why can't we have something like > >result = lockinginset->localDispatch(..,actio