Le 07/04/2017 à 07:20, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
Doxygen can take the content of e.g. a README or some other document and
use that as the main page.
The main page can be an introduction to developers, or simply a bunch of
links to other developer documents.
If anyone want's examples, here a
On 6 April 2017 at 13:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 04/04/2017 à 22:08, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Should the Doxygen docs have a "main page"? At
>> https://www.lyx.org/sourcedoc/latest/index.html
>> the main page is currently empty.
>>
>> I don't know if this is an
Le 04/04/2017 à 22:08, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
Hi,
Should the Doxygen docs have a "main page"? At
https://www.lyx.org/sourcedoc/latest/index.html
the main page is currently empty.
I don't know if this is an error on my side, or if we simply haven't
created a main page.
I really kn
On 28 February 2017 at 03:24, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Currently we're also keeping all the previously generated "sourcedocs".
> > There I'm guessing we at most would like to keep a few, or perhaps none.
>
> I don't see the need for the older ones.
I'm changing the
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Currently we're also keeping all the previously generated "sourcedocs".
> There I'm guessing we at most would like to keep a few, or perhaps none.
I don't see the need for the older ones.
> PPS:
> As the bash script etc is deployed on the server, please let me know
Le 26/02/2017 à 22:46, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
Hi,
I just want to let people know that (hopefully) we now have a working
pipeline where:
- A CI job [1] on Mondays, builds and uses Doxygen to generate "sourcedoc"
- The LyX server, on Tuesdays, then pulls in and deploys the "sourcedoc"
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 14/02/2014 07:22, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>>> http://www.lyx.org/Development points to an outdated doxygen site
>>> generated
>>> from LyX 2.0 SVN. If this cannot be updated from GIT, shouldn't we rather
>>> remove this link?
>>
>> I woul
Le 14/02/2014 07:22, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/Development points to an outdated doxygen site generated
from LyX 2.0 SVN. If this cannot be updated from GIT, shouldn't we rather
remove this link?
I would prefer to update it (IIRC JMarc has access and wa
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> http://www.lyx.org/Development points to an outdated doxygen site generated
> from LyX 2.0 SVN. If this cannot be updated from GIT, shouldn't we rather
> remove this link?
I would prefer to update it (IIRC JMarc has access and was doing it last time,
right?)
Pavel
From: Pavel Sanda [sa...@lyx.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 6:34 PM
>Doxygen generation is not related to LFUNs.lyx.
> - doxygen: make doxydoc
> - LFUNs.lyx: make lfundoc
Thanks,
Scott
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> How do I turn LyXAction.cpp into LFUNs.lyx?
Doxygen generation is not related to LFUNs.lyx.
- doxygen: make doxydoc
- LFUNs.lyx: make lfundoc
Pavel
Le 15/07/12 21:07, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
How do I turn LyXAction.cpp into LFUNs.lyx?
I think you need development/tools/gen_lfuns.py.
JMarc
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:47:45AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-/** Used to insert bibitem's information (key and label)
+/
+//
+// InsetBibItem
+//
+//
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:47:45AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-/** Used to insert bibitem's information (key and label)
+/
+//
+// InsetBibItem
+//
+//
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:47:45AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> -/** Used to insert bibitem's information (key and label)
>> +/
>> +//
>> +// InsetBibItem
>> +//
>> +//
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:47:45AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> -/** Used to insert bibitem's information (key and label)
>> +/
>> +//
>> +// InsetBibItem
>> +//
>> +//
Am Mittwoch, 19. Mai 2004 17:31 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> I just tried to run doxygen, but stopped when is complained:
> To avoid this warning please update your configuration file using "doxygen
-u"
>
> Doing so, (Doxyfile is a generated file, so I'd guess that the changes
> should be applied b
John Levon wrote:
>> What am I doing wrong? The generated html is worse than confusing.
> You open a group twice ...
You mean I can't nest them? Oh well.
--
Angus
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:25:40PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> What am I doing wrong? The generated html is worse than confusing.
>
//@{
/** These methods are publicly accessible because they are
* invoked
* by the parent container.
*/
//@{
/
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:49:50AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Nope, it is space waiting for your comments.
and for things needing no comments ?
I really don't see the point in :
/// constructor
SomeClass();
regards
john
p.s. and yes I have a few sourcedoc improvement
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:01:59AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> By Executive Order we are from now on using doxygen for our source
> documentation.
Great. There's just one problem: no organization. What classes are
core? Which class(es) is(are) a good starting point for feature
"foo
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 14 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >
| > By Executive Order we are from now on using doxygen for our source
| > documentation.
| >
| > Doc++ just had too many problems.
|
| wow, I didn't know we *weren't* using doxygen ;)
Officially we wer
On 14 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> By Executive Order we are from now on using doxygen for our source
> documentation.
>
> Doc++ just had too many problems.
wow, I didn't know we *weren't* using doxygen ;)
> http://www.lyx.org/~larsbj/html/index.html
>
> for an example of
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 14 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >
| > By Executive Order we are from now on using doxygen for our source
| > documentation.
|
| Who keeps saying I don't want to be "The Boss" ;-)
:-) and I really don't. Better to work from concensus.
| A
On 14 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> By Executive Order we are from now on using doxygen for our source
> documentation.
Who keeps saying I don't want to be "The Boss" ;-)
> However doxygen supports the same sysntax as Doc++ so we don't have to
> change anything.
Yay!
> Point your b
25 matches
Mail list logo
