John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 14 Dec 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >
| > By Executive Order we are from now on using doxygen for our source
| > documentation.
| >
| > Doc++ just had too many problems.
|
| wow, I didn't know we *weren't* using doxygen ;)
Officially we were using Doc++
|
| > http://www.lyx.org/~larsbj/html/index.html
| >
| > for an example of how the documentation will look.
| >
| > It will be a lot better when it is documented properly.
| >
| > Also note that we will have a harsher documentation regime when
| > 1.2.0cvs starts up. Patces without documentation will not be applied.
|
| How strict is this ? Short obvious methods don't need docs right
| ? Especially if the class is not for "general" use (e.g. KDE ParaDialog
| class).
Obvious methods does also need documentation, but not more than a
\brief.
Lgb