Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> But as a dock widget there is not
> much difference for the user to a toolbar button...
I think I agree (but then we'll need good shortcuts, as Abdel already noted).
Jürgen
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
because it's a dialog (at least it was), not a toolbar.
Maybe the fact of it being now a dock widget changes things.
Ok, a dialog is different I agree. But as a dock widget there is not
much difference for the user to a toolbar button...
While playing with the toc a
because it's a dialog (at least it was), not a toolbar.
Maybe the fact of it being now a dock widget changes things.
Ok, a dialog is different I agree. But as a dock widget there is not
much difference for the user to a toolbar button...
While playing with the toc a bit, is there a way to ch
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> There are hundreds of toolbar icons which do not display the shortcut
> directly. Why is the TOC different?
because it's a dialog (at least it was), not a toolbar.
Maybe the fact of it being now a dock widget changes things.
> In fact the icons looking ugly is not the
Am 29.04.2007 um 11:34 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
In fact the icons looking ugly is not the main problem, but the
minimal width of the
"buttons", not icons...
Schimmi
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Am 29.04.2007 um 11:18 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
We have a reason for not using icons: missing accelerators.
I know and the solution is to add accelerators that will work for
both
the TOC widget and the WorkArea.
I mean: when using icons, you it's harder to gu
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
We have a reason for not using icons: missing accelerators.
I know and the solution is to add accelerators that will work for both
the TOC widget and the WorkArea.
I mean: when using icons, you it's harder to guess which accelerator is bound
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > We have a reason for not using icons: missing accelerators.
>
> I know and the solution is to add accelerators that will work for both
> the TOC widget and the WorkArea.
I mean: when using icons, you it's harder to guess which accelerator is bound
to which action. Wit
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
The current TOC widget hurts my eyes, with labels like -> and a minimal
width of 300 (a guess) pixels, see below. To make it a bit nicer (the
slider still doesn't look right for my gui taste) I converted the
buttons into toolbar buttons (No idea
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > The current TOC widget hurts my eyes, with labels like -> and a minimal
> > width of 300 (a guess) pixels, see below. To make it a bit nicer (the
> > slider still doesn't look right for my gui taste) I converted the
> > buttons into toolbar buttons (No idea if there is
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
The current TOC widget hurts my eyes, with labels like -> and a minimal
width of 300 (a guess) pixels, see below. To make it a bit nicer (the
slider still doesn't look right for my gui taste) I converted the
buttons into toolbar buttons (No idea if there is an eas
11 matches
Mail list logo
