Am Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:00:41 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:44:38 +0200
> schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
>
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:15:54PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:43 +0200
> > > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> > >
> > > > Le 08/09
Am Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:44:38 +0200
schrieb Enrico Forestieri :
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:15:54PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:43 +0200
> > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> >
> > > Le 08/09/2020 à 13:33, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > >> So, it fails to compute
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:15:54PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:43 +0200
> schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> > Le 08/09/2020 à 13:33, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > >> So, it fails to compute it correctly when the zoom changes.
> > >
> > > Anyway, the attached patch s
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:48:43PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 08/09/2020 à 13:33, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > So, it fails to compute it correctly when the zoom changes.
> >
> > Anyway, the attached patch seems to do the trick.
>
> Looks good. How confident are you that it does
Am Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:48:43 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 08/09/2020 à 13:33, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >> So, it fails to compute it correctly when the zoom changes.
> >
> > Anyway, the attached patch seems to do the trick.
>
> Looks good. How confident are you that it does
Le 08/09/2020 à 13:33, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
So, it fails to compute it correctly when the zoom changes.
Anyway, the attached patch seems to do the trick.
Looks good. How confident are you that it does not break something else?
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
ht
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:09:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:00:15PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 08/09/2020 à 12:22, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:41:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > > Le 08/09/2020 à 00:11
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:00:15PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 08/09/2020 à 12:22, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:41:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 08/09/2020 à 00:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > > Likely. Possibly the culprit is 79998
Le 08/09/2020 à 12:22, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:41:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 08/09/2020 à 00:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Likely. Possibly the culprit is 79998fdc. However, after that commit,
the "2" in \int_0^2 does not clash with the integral
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:41:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 08/09/2020 à 00:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > Likely. Possibly the culprit is 79998fdc. However, after that commit,
> > the "2" in \int_0^2 does not clash with the integral anymore.
> > It seems that you can't have you
Le 08/09/2020 à 00:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Likely. Possibly the culprit is 79998fdc. However, after that commit,
the "2" in \int_0^2 does not clash with the integral anymore.
It seems that you can't have your cake and eat it, too.
Something is a bit fishy in terms of metrics though. Loo
Le 08/09/2020 à 02:25, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
If you look at the output, adding a character after \cap also modifies
the spacing around it. It seems that the on-screen representation
is able to follow more closely the latex output.
Yes, this was my big work on mathed for 2.3.
JMarc
--
lyx
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:25:57AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:30:25PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:11:25AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:52:11PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > >
> > > > To repro
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:30:25PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:11:25AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:52:11PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > To reproduce, open the attached file. Put the cursor just after \cap. It
> > > might
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:11:25AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:52:11PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > To reproduce, open the attached file. Put the cursor just after \cap. It
> > might help to zoom in. For me, it shows that the cursor intersects the
> > \cap.
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:52:11PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> To reproduce, open the attached file. Put the cursor just after \cap. It
> might help to zoom in. For me, it shows that the cursor intersects the
> \cap.
For me it does not intersect but the cursor is practically attached to \cap.
Am Mon, 7 Sep 2020 15:52:11 -0400
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> To reproduce, open the attached file. Put the cursor just after \cap. It
> might help to zoom in. For me, it shows that the cursor intersects the
> \cap.
I see it too, but only with BIG zoom.
> I see this on master and 2.3.x, but not
17 matches
Mail list logo