On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:30:25PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:11:25AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:52:11PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > To reproduce, open the attached file. Put the cursor just after \cap. It > > > might help to zoom in. For me, it shows that the cursor intersects the > > > \cap. > > > > For me it does not intersect but the cursor is practically attached to \cap. > > However, I see that it also depends on what symbol follows. If I add a > > single letter just after \cap, the spacing between \cap and the cursor > > increases. So, maybe the problem is with the metrics of the following > > symbol (the left bearing, perhaps). > > > > > I see this on master and 2.3.x, but not on 2.3.0. I think it's because > > > there were improvements with respect to 2.3.0 to spacing with these > > > types of operators. > > > > Likely. Possibly the culprit is 79998fdc. However, after that commit, > > the "2" in \int_0^2 does not clash with the integral anymore. > > It seems that you can't have your cake and eat it, too. > > I agree that fix is more important than this minor issue I bring up. And > usually there is something that follows the \cap so if anything the > issue only happens for a split second.
If you look at the output, adding a character after \cap also modifies the spacing around it. It seems that the on-screen representation is able to follow more closely the latex output. -- Enrico -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
