Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> I think I prefer this for now. The above sounds very Juergen> sensible, but I do not understand the toclevel thing Juergen> completely. Please feel free to adjust it to your plans. OK, go ahead. JMarc

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-14 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen> What do you think? > > I think that it is possible to iterate over the QListView entries with > first/nextSibling, and that it is easy to iterate over a lyxtextclass > (using the built-in operator) and extract the list of layouts that > have TocLevel >= 0. > >

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> It is sufficient to "shift" part one step up in my case Juergen> (i.e., to the chapter position, when there is no chapter). Juergen> tocdepth and secnumdepth are using the same values for Juergen> section--subparagraph in

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> - If we wanted to be really smart, we should get the name of the >> sections for each level from the layout file (LyXLayout::toclevel). >> We could put in the QListView all the layouts that have a nonzero >> toclevel. Juergen>

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-11 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The following preliminary patch fixes the problem. Why is it > preliminary, I hear you ask? Because I am not sure why artcile and > book use different TocLevel settings for things like sections and > Subsections. So currently, the display is off-by-one for books. > > J

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-11 Thread Helge Hafting
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:25:58PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > The following preliminary patch fixes the problem. Why is it > preliminary, I hear you ask? Because I am not sure why artcile and > book use different TocLevel settings for things like sections and > Subsections. So currentl

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Helge" == Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Helge> It has been a while since I had a crash or malfunction to Helge> report. So here is the biggest problem currently: Helge> Numbering of subsubsections are displayed wrong in lyx. I have Helge> set things up so chapters, sections and

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-09 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I like it. However: > > - this really feels like you should just iterate over the QListView > rows to set them to yes/no and not keep track of whih one is > subparagraph or section. This would be much simpler I think. I don't think this is possible (without referr

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-08 Thread Helge Hafting
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:52:20PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Helge> Numbering of subsubsections are displayed wrong in lyx. I have > > Helge> set things up so chapters, sections and subsections are > > Helge> numbered, and the output reflects that. But ins

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Helge> Numbering of subsubsections are displayed wrong in lyx. I have Helge> set things up so chapters, sections and subsections are Helge> numbered, and the output reflects that. But inside ly

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Helge> Numbering of subsubsections are displayed wrong in lyx. I have > Helge> set things up so chapters, sections and subsections are > Helge> numbered, and the output reflects that. But inside lyx, the > Helge> subsubsections are also numbered and that is irritating

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-08 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:53, Helge Hafting wrote: > It has been a while since I had a crash or malfunction to report. > So here is the biggest problem currently: > > Numbering of subsubsections are displayed wrong in lyx. I have set > things up so chapters, sections and subsections are numbered,

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What happens is that the QListView by default sorts on the first > column. This means that the items inserted in the list are set in > alphabetical order, and the setSorting(-1) which is done later happens > too late. > > I guess what should be done is to remove the in

Re: Cosmetic but annoying problem

2005-04-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Helge" == Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Helge> It has been a while since I had a crash or malfunction to Helge> report. So here is the biggest problem currently: Helge> Numbering of subsubsections are displayed wrong in lyx. I have Helge> set things up so chapters, sections and