On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:53, Helge Hafting wrote:
> It has been a while since I had a crash or malfunction to report.
> So here is the biggest problem currently:
> 
> Numbering of subsubsections are displayed wrong in lyx.  I have set
> things up so chapters, sections and subsections are numbered,
> and the output reflects that. 
> But inside lyx, the subsubsections are also numbered and that is
> irritating to look at.  They should be unnumbered, as they are
> in the output.  It is nice that lyx 1.4 shows the correct numbering
> inside lyx, but it is a bit overdone when even unnumbered section
> levels gets numbers.
> 
> Also, the dialog for setting the level for numbering is screwed up.
> The sliders actually work, but now shows this:
> 
> "example"        "numbered" "shows in TOC"
> chapter            yes yes
> paragraph       yes yes
> part                  yes yes
> section             yes yes
> subparagraph  no no
> subsection        no no
> subsubsection  no no
> 
> Moving the sliders simply move the yes/no barrier up and down.
> But the elements are not in correct order!
> I believe the correct order is something like:
> Part
> Chapter
> Section
> Subsection
> Subsubsection
> paragraph
> subparagraph
> 
> It'd also be nice to see instantly what the numbering will look like, i.e:
> Example numbered TOC "Looks like"
> Part                   yes yes    Part 1
> Chapter            yes yes    1 Chaptername
> Section             yes yes     1.1 sectionname
> Subsection       yes yes    1.1.1 subsectionname
> Subsubsection  no no      subsubsectionname
> paragraph         no no     paragraphname
> subparagraph  no  no     subparagraphname
> 
> Well, the exact layout of a section name obviously depends on language
> and various latex packages and options.  But at least the default
> layout in the UI language would be nice to have here.
> 
> Helge Hafting

Actually this seems like an UI-only bug: somebody placed the wrong
labels on the rows. Internally they are in the right order. And then
there is apparently an off-by-one on the display side.

Someone with Qt Designer experience should fix the first part. It's hard
to fix the second part blindly.

- Martin


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to