> It is the save/saveas part that annoys me most. My understanding is that
> embedding or not, I am working on the same file.
A possible solution to the save/saveas problem might be linking .lyx
and .lyz tightly and say 'save a bundled copy' instead of 'save in
bundled format'. Then, .lyx will alw
> In case it is not clear (and I agree that it is not) the question about
> secondary argument refers to unpacking in place.
Unpacking will prompt for overwrite if file.lyx already exists. It is
the save/saveas part that annoys me most. My understanding is that
embedding or not, I am working on
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 09:09:10 Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 08:28 +0100, José Matos wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 September 2007 21:45:07 Bo Peng wrote:
> > > Remember, if you have file.lyz and file.lyx in the same directory,
> > > unpacking file.lyz will overwrite file.lyx. Yo
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 08:28 +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2007 21:45:07 Bo Peng wrote:
> > Remember, if you have file.lyz and file.lyx in the same directory,
> > unpacking file.lyz will overwrite file.lyx. You also have to decide if
> > you want to save file.lyx along with file
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 21:45:07 Bo Peng wrote:
> I am not in favor of a separate file extension partly because of the
> extra work (document, .cpp etc).
I am not either.
> If it is decided to use one, I would
> prefer .lyz. 'z' is after 'x', it means 'compression', and '.lyz'
> actually
> If we want a different suffix for embedded lyx files why not to call them
> .elyx?
I am not in favor of a separate file extension partly because of the
extra work (document, .cpp etc). If it is decided to use one, I would
prefer .lyz. 'z' is after 'x', it means 'compression', and '.lyz'
actuall
> I don't care so much if we drop the feature of reading compress files
> with
> lyx as long as the program deals with lyx.gz files.
I agree that we can drop the compression feature as long as lyx2lyx
can decompress compressed files so that lyx can read it. As for the
embedding feature, t
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 21:20:42 José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been busy and did not had much to develop in LyX but here are
> some
> of my thoughts on the subject of compression.
>
> I don't care so much if we drop the feature of reading compress files
> with
> lyx as long as
