On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, John Weiss wrote:
> OTOH, the "->" should NOT turn into ERT in the manuals.
Um, this is what I meant. I can't live without a little ERT elsewhere.
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "alstrup" == alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> plain white triangle is good enough for now. We just have to get a
>> better looking display on screen. Could somebody (asger?) make it
>> draw a non-purple triangle?
alstrup> When I find the time. I'll find it before the 1st of March,
> plain white triangle is good enough for now. We just have to get a
> better looking display on screen. Could somebody (asger?) make it draw
> a non-purple triangle?
When I find the time.
I'll find it before the 1st of March, promise, but other than that
I can't say when.
Greets,
Asger
> "Mate" == Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mate> On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 10:07:42AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Mate> wrote:
>> > "John" == John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Okay, so the triangle is an appropriate mnemonic for submenus.
John> What about menu items? Su
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 10:07:42AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John> Okay, so the triangle is an appropriate mnemonic for submenus.
> John> What about menu items? Surely there is no triangle for menu
> John> items.
As in the menus
> "John" == John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 03:17:57PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
>> but why not use the math \rightarrow, in math mode,
>>
>> Again, $\to$ is more economical. In defense of triangleright: I
>> just looked how the submenus are indicated on
On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 08:50:41AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure I like the triangle solution that has been presented, but I
> can live with it. What I do want to stress, though, is that the accepted
> solution SHOULD NOT BE ERT IN THE LYX FILE! Sorry about the shouting,
On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 06:01:30PM +0100, Peter Suetterlin wrote:
>
> I was quite content with the -> solution as long as the display in LyX
> is concerned. However, it looks horrible when printed. That's why we
> used the arrow.
Yes. "->" was a compromise; it looks okay online, but not-so-h
On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 03:17:57PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> but why not use the math \rightarrow, in math mode,
>
> Again, $\to$ is more economical.
> In defense of triangleright: I just looked how the submenus are
> indicated on my window manager's menu. They are triangleright. The
Oka
> Hi, I'm not sure I like the triangle solution that has been
> presented, but I can live with it. What I do want to stress,
> though, is that the accepted solution SHOULD NOT BE ERT IN THE
> LYX FILE! Sorry about the shouting, but I feel strongly on this
> one, and I'm sure John W
I think the original objection to this was that you have to go into math
mode to use it.
Define a macro (as I suggested in my first post) and you will not have
to bother with math mode.
Mate
but why not use the math \rightarrow, in math mode,
Again, $\to$ is more economical.
In defense of triangleright: I just looked how the submenus are
indicated on my window manager's menu. They are triangleright. The
wm is windowmaker, but I see the same under fvwm2.
In any case, it was alr
Oh, BTW, I'm bringing this all up again because I assume it will fall to
me to change this everywhere in the documentation :-) or is that :-( or
perhaps :+| (punched nose)
I just want to make darn sure there is a "correct" solution in place
before I start hacking on 300+ pages of documentation ag
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Carl Ollivier-Gooch wrote:
> Um, I hate to burst in on all the complex scheming going on for this
> issue, but why not use the math \rightarrow, in math mode, which LyX
> already displays as an arrow? Wouldn't this be much simpler, at least
> until such time as we support di
On 19-Feb-99 Peter Suetterlin wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not sure I like the triangle solution that has been presented, but I
>> can live with it. What I do want to stress, though, is that the accepted
>> solution SHOULD NOT BE ERT IN THE LYX FILE! Sorry about the shouting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure I like the triangle solution that has been presented, but I
> can live with it. What I do want to stress, though, is that the accepted
> solution SHOULD NOT BE ERT IN THE LYX FILE! Sorry about the shouting, but
> I feel strongly on this one, and I'm
> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> Hi, I'm not sure I like the triangle solution that has been
Mike> presented, but I can live with it. What I do want to stress,
Mike> though, is that the accepted solution SHOULD NOT BE ERT IN THE
Mike> LYX FILE! Sorry about the shouting, but I f
17 matches
Mail list logo
