On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 06:51:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lars> Better layout of classes and interfaces, a lot of our code is
> Lars> over complicated and bloated. We have a lot of classes that are
> Lars> way to big, and be making the class hirachy better we can
> Lars> compile fast
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Better layout of classes and interfaces, a lot of our code is
| Lars> over complicated and bloated. We have a lot of classes that are
| Lars> way to big, and be making the c
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Better layout of classes and interfaces, a lot of our code is
Lars> over complicated and bloated. We have a lot of classes that are
Lars> way to big, and be making the class hirachy better we can
Lars> compile faster and end up
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So 1.3.0cvs is already much bigger than 1.2.0?
Yes, a bit.
| Yes. But the bloat is a pain.
I wouldn't call it bloat though.
| Lars> If you see that, please tell me pronto, it is not like my
| Lars> compiles are fast either...
>
| Sorry, it s
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Ooh... I am annoyed with xforms... I'd be glad to get rid of it
Lars> 1.0 or no 1.0. How long were we promissed a open source xforms?
Lars> How many times has the 1.0 released been promissed now? I just
Lars> do not trust that
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> I did not know that it would break...
>
| I can believe that.
I am also a bit sad that it did... because I really like the boost
version a lot more than my own.
| So you a
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I did not know that it would break...
I can believe that.
Lars> I do not understand (nor accept) your reasons for clinging to
Lars> lyxstring.
Lars> ... motivation is a downer right now ...
Lars> the lot of you are just a b
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 27-May-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Juergen> Do we have basic_string somewhere in lyxstring?
>>
>> I took a look, and boost::regexp seems to make a large use of
>> basic_string, even if we disable use of wide strings. So Lars, does it
>> me
On 27-May-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Do we have basic_string somewhere in lyxstring?
>
> I took a look, and boost::regexp seems to make a large use of
> basic_string, even if we disable use of wide strings. So Lars, does it
> mean that you put us in a situation of forcing the d
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> What can we do about this: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
Juergen> -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem
Juergen> /usr/X11R6/include -g -W -Wall -Wp,-MD,.deps/lstrings.pp -c
Juergen> lstrings.C In file include
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What can we do about this:
>
| g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -I../../boost
| -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -W -Wall -Wp,-MD,.deps/lstrings.pp -c lstrings.C
| In file included from ../../boost/boost/regex/regex_traits.h
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| If we really do want to use getline(), then the LString.h code should
| bring have a "using std::getline" for real string.
Yes, we could do that.
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Hmm of course... if you just remove the std:: on getline? what
Lars> happens then?
It does work, but will not work if we use the real string. I guess the
real solution is to rewrite this part of code...
If we really do want t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| With latest cvs, compilation dies with
|
| cxx: Error: ../../../../lyx-devel/src/frontends/controllers/ControlCredits.C, line
|57:
| no instance of overloaded function "std::getline" matches the
| argument list
|
14 matches
Mail list logo
