>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> What can we do about this: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. Juergen> -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem Juergen> /usr/X11R6/include -g -W -Wall -Wp,-MD,.deps/lstrings.pp -c Juergen> lstrings.C In file included from Juergen> ../../boost/boost/regex/regex_traits.hpp:28, from Juergen> ../../boost/boost/regex.hpp:49, from lstrings.C:22: Juergen> ../../boost/boost/regex/detail/regex_cstring.hpp:72: Juergen> `::basic_string' undeclared (first use here) ... Juergen> Do we have basic_string somewhere in lyxstring? I took a look, and boost::regexp seems to make a large use of basic_string, even if we disable use of wide strings. So Lars, does it mean that you put us in a situation of forcing the death of lyxstring just for the pleasure of using boost::regexp? I would have preferred a discussion beforehand. JMarc
