Re: biblatex warning about loading csquotes

On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 01:51:57PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Samstag, dem 05.04.2025 um 11:49 +0200 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > On one of my documents I get the following warning: > > > >   Package biblatex Warning: 'babel/polyglossia' detected but > > 'csquotes' missing. > > > > Sho

Re: biblatex warning about loading csquotes

Am Samstag, dem 05.04.2025 um 11:49 +0200 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On one of my documents I get the following warning: > >   Package biblatex Warning: 'babel/polyglossia' detected but > 'csquotes' missing. > > Should we load csquotes whenever using biblatex and either babel or > polyglossia? N

Re: biblatex-chicago cite engine

Am Mittwoch, dem 31.08.2022 um 13:56 +0100 schrieb madmurphy: > I wanted to use the biblatex-chicago package instead of the plain > biblatex, but it appeared harder to do than I thought. After digging > around a bit I found out that three years ago someone wanted to do > the same. So I have created

Re: biblatex-chicago cite engine

Thank you, Jürgen. It really needs a closer look. I just took the biblatex-natbib.citeengine file, made a few hacks for loading the right package (biblatex-chicago) and that's it – that's all I needed for my document. But it is definitely a must-have feature for LyX. --madmurphy On Sun, Sep 4, 2

Re: biblatex-chicago cite engine

Am Mittwoch, dem 31.08.2022 um 13:56 +0100 schrieb madmurphy: > I wanted to use the biblatex-chicago package instead of the plain > biblatex, but it appeared harder to do than I thought. After digging > around a bit I found out that three years ago someone wanted to do > the same. So I have created

Re: Biblatex Regression Inquiry [was: LyX 2.3.0...]

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 05/11/2018 11:44 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > LyX Developers, > > As I'm writing my dissertation, I've been using LyX 2.2.3 but today > decided to try migrating it to 2.3.0. Upon doing so, I encountered what > appears to be a reg

Re: Biblatex Regression Inquiry [was: LyX 2.3.0...]

On 05/11/2018 11:44 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > LyX Developers, > > As I'm writing my dissertation, I've been using LyX 2.2.3 but today > decided to try migrating it to 2.3.0.  Upon doing so, I encountered > what appears to be a regression (or else I've been doing something > invalid all along that 2

Re: Biblatex lyx2lyx: use biber

Am Mittwoch, den 20.12.2017, 16:05 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > OK let me know if you want me to work on that. Don't hold your breath. > > > OTOH we only support Biblatex officially as of 2.3. So I think it's > > OK > > if reversion is not perfect. > > I would be fine with this also. I gues

Re: Biblatex lyx2lyx: use biber

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:19:46PM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 20.12.2017, 12:36 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > Of the 17 preference files of users that I collected [1], none have > > the > > BufferParam "\bibtex_command" set. > > FWIW I had in LyX 2.2. > > > I guess w

Re: Biblatex lyx2lyx: use biber

Am Mittwoch, den 20.12.2017, 12:36 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > Of the 17 preference files of users that I collected [1], none have > the > BufferParam "\bibtex_command" set. FWIW I had in LyX 2.2. > I guess we have to weigh the benefit of having lyx2lyx work for the > defaults versus the cos

Re: Biblatex lyx2lyx: use biber

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:44:13AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 19.12.2017, 23:13 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > When using Biblatex and exporting to 2.2.x, I think we need to set > > the > > bibliography processor to biber, right? > > Not uncoditionally. Biblatex still

Re: Biblatex lyx2lyx: use biber

Am Dienstag, den 19.12.2017, 23:13 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > When using Biblatex and exporting to 2.2.x, I think we need to set > the > bibliography processor to biber, right? Not uncoditionally. Biblatex still also runs with backend=bibtex and backend=bibtex8. We should not touch the Buff

Re: Biblatex lyx2lyx: use biber

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:41:18AM +, Richard Heck wrote: > On 12/19/2017 11:13 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > When using Biblatex and exporting to 2.2.x, I think we need to set the > > bibliography processor to biber, right? > > > > I'm guessing this wasn't caught before because a lot of teste

Re: Biblatex lyx2lyx: use biber

On 12/19/2017 11:13 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > When using Biblatex and exporting to 2.2.x, I think we need to set the > bibliography processor to biber, right? > > I'm guessing this wasn't caught before because a lot of testers have > biber set in preferences. > > Attached is a patch. It works we

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

2017-01-16 15:57 GMT+01:00 PhilipPirrip : > Oh, I see. This should be in Tools>Preferences I guess since it's not > document-specific (is it being saved with the document?) > LyX could even remember the last value chosen for the bibtex inset. > No, it's document specific, since it depends on the

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

On 01/15/2017 09:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: This is an old feature. If you enter "default" in the bibliography style widget (in the BibTeX dialog), then this is replaced with this "Default bibtex style". I did not change this behavior, although I think the UI is sub-optimal. Oh, I see.

Re: Biblatex

Am Sonntag, den 15.01.2017, 20:53 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Ditto. Do you have a pointer on propaganda for biblatex vs bibtex ? The CTAN catalogue entry is telling enough: http://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex But of course it all depends on what features one needs. Here's another compari

Re: Biblatex

> On Monday, 16 January 2017, 2:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: > > Ditto. Do you have a pointer on propaganda for biblatex vs bibtex ? > > JMarc Reading the section called "User Guide" p. 43 ff in the actual Biblatex documentation will convey the sense of magnitude and flexibility of th

Re: Biblatex

On Sunday, 8 January 2017, 16:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >Biblatex support is ready over at the features/biblatex2 branch. > Great news! Thank you to all developers for the continual effort. This new feature will certainly be a highlight. Best wishes, Sam

Re: Biblatex

Ditto. Do you have a pointer on propaganda for biblatex vs bibtex ? JMarc Le 15 janvier 2017 20:06:45 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >Another thank you from me. I have actually delayed learning biblatex >since LyX hasn't supported it. Now I'm excited to eventually learn >about >it and us

Re: Biblatex

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 12:21:17PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 15.01.2017, 11:13 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > This is exciting, Juergen! > > > Pavel > > > > I am playing with it now. It is amazing, very nice work. > > ++1 > > Thank you both. It caused me quite some hea

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Am Sonntag, den 15.01.2017, 08:29 -0500 schrieb PhilipPirrip: > So this is yet another thing: what does "Default bibtex style" in  > Document Settings, Bibliography do? I don't see any change in latex > code. This is an old feature. If you enter "default" in the bibliography style widget (in the B

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Am Sonntag, den 15.01.2017, 07:49 -0500 schrieb PhilipPirrip: > Next: > open my childTwo.lyx alone. It's been set to use Natbib (BibTeX), > and  > LaTeX code reflects that. But the "xxx generated bibliography" has  > xxx=Biblatex, and it's impossible to change it to what it's supposed > to  > be, x

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

On 01/15/2017 08:16 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Which dialog? I don't see problems in Document->Settings->bibliography The dialog where you (normally/only) set the bibliography style: press the "Biblatex generated bibliography" button. The field "Style" is missing even though the document uses bi

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Am Sonntag, 15. Januar 2017 um 07:49:41, schrieb PhilipPirrip > Next: > open my childTwo.lyx alone. It's been set to use Natbib (BibTeX), and > LaTeX code reflects that. But the "xxx generated bibliography" has > xxx=Biblatex, and it's impossible to change it to what it's supposed to > be, xxx=

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Next: open my childTwo.lyx alone. It's been set to use Natbib (BibTeX), and LaTeX code reflects that. But the "xxx generated bibliography" has xxx=Biblatex, and it's impossible to change it to what it's supposed to be, xxx=Bibtex. That also prevents one from changing \bibliographystyle from {pl

Re: Biblatex

Am Sonntag, den 15.01.2017, 11:13 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > This is exciting, Juergen! > > Pavel > > I am playing with it now. It is amazing, very nice work. > ++1 Thank you both. It caused me quite some headache, so I'm glad it works out. Jürgen > Kornel signature.asc Description:

Re: Biblatex

Am Freitag, 13. Januar 2017 um 18:03:40, schrieb Pavel Sanda > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > I have put most energy into a design that enables portability between > > the diverse citation engines as much as possible, so it should be very > > easy to switch an existing document from, say, natbib to

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Am Samstag, den 14.01.2017, 07:39 -0500 schrieb PhilipPirrip: > On 01/14/2017 05:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > I prefer to get them without jumping through such hoops. > > I'm sorry, I was switching from t'bird to some other news readdder. > Attaching the files again. Thanks! Should be fix

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

On 01/14/2017 05:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I prefer to get them without jumping through such hoops. I'm sorry, I was switching from t'bird to some other news readdder. Attaching the files again. childOne.lyx Description: application/lyx childTwo.lyx Description: application/lyx mas

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Am Samstag, den 14.01.2017, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > They did. How to get the data: > 1.) save the mail to a file, e.g. /tmp/childOne.lyx > 2.) use uudeview on that file (in another directory) > ==> you get the undecoded childOne.lyx I prefer to get them without jumping through su

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Am Samstag, 14. Januar 2017 um 10:15:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Am Freitag, den 13.01.2017, 20:17 + schrieb PhilipPirrip: > > I'm reporting that the master document won't compile with a child > > document containing some commands specific to natbib. > > In the attached examples, it wil

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Am Freitag, den 13.01.2017, 20:17 + schrieb PhilipPirrip: > I'm reporting that the master document won't compile with a child  > document containing some commands specific to natbib. > In the attached examples, it will be because of a citation command > in  > childOne.lyx.  > Can this be transl

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) settings dialog

Am Freitag, den 13.01.2017, 19:32 + schrieb PhilipPirrip: > Hope you don't mind if I report other findings here. Reporting on > lyx.org  > bug tracker takes too much time: No, that's perfect. > New document. Choose biblatex in Document Settings. Insert an > option,  > Apply. Delete the option

Re: Biblatex

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > I have put most energy into a design that enables portability between > the diverse citation engines as much as possible, so it should be very > easy to switch an existing document from, say, natbib to biblatex and > (to a limited degree, since the feature set is larger)

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:47:12 +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Right. As I wrote you: please update to the most recent version (which > is in master meanwhile, not features/biblatex2!). > > Please report back if this issue still persists. This is what I understand you did: even if the child doe

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child - "childOne.lyx" yEnc

=ybegin line=128 size=1856 name=childOne.lyx Mv��J\X]J���JJXJp��JJJ���JdYY���X���X���Y4��J_]Z4���4�4� �J4���J���4��J���4J4���J��X���4��

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child - "childTwo.lyx" yEnc

=ybegin line=128 size=1919 name=childTwo.lyx Mv��J\X]J���JJXJp��JJJ���JdYY���X���X���Y4��J_]Z4���4�4� �J4���J���4��J���4J4���J��X���4��

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child - "master.lyx" yEnc

=ybegin line=128 size=2094 name=master.lyx Mv��J\X]J���JJXJp��JJJ���JdYY���X���X���Y4��J_]Z4���4�4� �J4���J���4��J���4J4�J�4�J�

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) settings dialog

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:48:13 +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > I think I have fixed this today. > Please try again with recent master (not features/biblatex2). OK, thanks. This works now. Hope you don't mind if I report other findings here. Reporting on lyx.org bug tracker takes too much time:

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) settings dialog

Am Freitag, den 13.01.2017, 17:40 + schrieb PhilipPirrip: > The biblatex settings dialog enters some undefined state when one  > - chooses Style engine Biblatex > - changes, for example, Biblatex bibliography style field to some > other  > value > - presses either of the two Reset buttons or Ma

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

Am Freitag, den 13.01.2017, 12:32 -0500 schrieb Richard Heck: > On 01/13/2017 12:29 PM, PhilipPirrip wrote: > > This is probably more of a general issue: when *master* is set to > > use  > > biblatex, and a child hasn't been changed to use biblatex as well > > but  > > uses, for example, natbib, tw

Re: biblatex (features/biblatex2) branch and master/child

On 01/13/2017 12:29 PM, PhilipPirrip wrote: > This is probably more of a general issue: when *master* is set to use > biblatex, and a child hasn't been changed to use biblatex as well but > uses, for example, natbib, two inconsistencies can happen: > 1) when child contains "Insert>...>Bibliograph

Re: Biblatex

Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > I propose to merge this to master rather soon, to give it more > testing > and iron out potential bugs. I'll merge tomorrow if I get no veto. Jürgen > > Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message pa

Re: Biblatex

On 01/09/2017 04:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/01/2017 à 10:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : >> Having said that, I agree that LyX 2.3 could be released rather soon >> after this has settled. We also already have some other nice new >> features and substantial code refactoring (esp. dr

Re: Biblatex

On 01/08/2017 10:03 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 9/01/2017 7:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> >> Thanks so much for doing this. I've not yet moved to biblatex myself, >> but this will encourage me to give it a try. >> >> Richard >> >> >> On 01/08/2017 04:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> Biblat

Re: Biblatex

Le 09/01/2017 à 10:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Having said that, I agree that LyX 2.3 could be released rather soon after this has settled. We also already have some other nice new features and substantial code refactoring (esp. drawing improvements). But it's not my call. I would second

Re: Biblatex

Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 16:03 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > Given the age of this enhancement request and the number of people > over  > the years who have enquired about biblatex support in LyX, I wonder > if  > any thought has been given to its release? It feels more like the  > centrepiece

Re: Biblatex

On 9/01/2017 7:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: Thanks so much for doing this. I've not yet moved to biblatex myself, but this will encourage me to give it a try. Richard On 01/08/2017 04:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Biblatex support is ready over at the features/biblatex2 branch. Of course

Re: Biblatex

Thanks so much for doing this. I've not yet moved to biblatex myself, but this will encourage me to give it a try. Richard On 01/08/2017 04:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Biblatex support is ready over at the features/biblatex2 branch. > > Of course we do not support the whole range of bibl

Re: biblatex native support

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 07:11:12PM +0200, dd3fmlli wrote: > Hi! Sorry to open again this thread. > I was testing the trick > > > > ​​ > > \ifcsname input@path\endcsname\else\def\input@path{{./}}\fi > > \def\setbibname#1#2{\edef\bibname{#1#2}} > > \expandafter\setbibname\input@path{ > > ​ > > ​ >

Re: biblatex native support

Hi! Sorry to open again this thread. I was testing the trick > ​​ > \ifcsname input@path\endcsname\else\def\input@path{{./}}\fi > \def\setbibname#1#2{\edef\bibname{#1#2}} > \expandafter\setbibname\input@path{ > ​ > ​ > curren.bib} > \addbibresource{\bibname} > > ​(since I don't understand it very

Re: biblatex native support

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 09:40:46AM -0700, PhilipPirrip wrote: > I'm bringing this up again with another idea: > Would you consider adding support, either through a layout file or the > document settings menu, for the inclusion of auxiliary files that need to be > copied to the temporary folder whe

Re: biblatex native support

I'm bringing this up again with another idea: Would you consider adding support, either through a layout file or the document settings menu, for the inclusion of auxiliary files that need to be copied to the temporary folder where and whenever LaTeX compilation takes place. This is a possible s

Re: biblatex-module

2015-04-14 17:06 GMT+02:00 Jean-Pierre Chrétien: > Hello, > > Following a thread on the French mailing list, is there a reason not to > include the biblatex module in the LyX distribution ? > I can of course easily download it from the wiki to my lyx personal layout > directory, but it would be ap

Re: Biblatex module--help on syntax welcome

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:46 PM, stefano franchi > wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Jurgen was not kidding when he said the syntax of the bib modules is > > somewhat crypticand the documentation is a bit sparse(;-)) > > > > So here are a

Re: Biblatex module--help on syntax welcome

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:46 PM, stefano franchi wrote: > Dear all, > > Jurgen was not kidding when he said the syntax of the bib modules is > somewhat crypticand the documentation is a bit sparse(;-)) > > So here are a few notes that may serve as a base for a fuller documentation > effort. In

Re: biblatex native support

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-11-03 18:52 GMT+01:00 PhilipPirrip: > >> I'm wondering what went wrong with GSoC 2014 promises for biblatex/LyX. >> > > Lack of manpower. > > Well, it was not only that. We did receive two Summer of Code of proposals for the Biblate

Re: biblatex native support

2014-11-03 18:52 GMT+01:00 PhilipPirrip: > I'm wondering what went wrong with GSoC 2014 promises for biblatex/LyX. > Lack of manpower. Jürgen

Re: biblatex native support

On 11/03/2014 11:23 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Actually, I think bib files should _always_ be placed in the texmf tree (except for very rare cases, that is). Why don't you distribute your template in a way that assures this (e.g., via CTAN)? Jürgen I wish it was that simple. How many user

Re: biblatex native support

PhilipPirrip wrote: > No, that won't work. This is a template that we ship as a package, and > is supposed to work as-is. Having (mostly inexperienced) users change > the preamble in all ~10 files or place the files in the texmf tree would > not be a good idea. Actually, I think bib files should _

Re: biblatex native support

On 11/03/2014 11:04 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: And I would strongly recommend the former, i.e., placing the file in the texmf tree. Then you do not need absolute paths. No, that won't work. This is a template that we ship as a package, and is supposed to work as-is. Having (mostly inexperi

Re: biblatex native support

PhilipPirrip wrote: > Because Step 3 at http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex says so: > > Note that the bib file must either be located in your texmf tree, or > you must enter an absolute path in the command above (e.g. > \addbibresource{/Users/me/Documents/bibdesk/Dissertation.bib} on the Mac, >

Re: biblatex native support

On 11/01/2014 03:17 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: PhilipPirrip wrote: I apologize for asking the same question over and over again. I'm still wondering if there was any progress with native biblatex support in LyX. I'm maintaining a package that should switch to biblatex soon, the only problem i

Re: biblatex native support

PhilipPirrip wrote: > I apologize for asking the same question over and over again. I'm still > wondering if there was any progress with native biblatex support in LyX. > I'm maintaining a package that should switch to biblatex soon, the only > problem is that we can't offer it our users as a ha

Re: biblatex native support

Dear developers, I apologize for asking the same question over and over again. I'm still wondering if there was any progress with native biblatex support in LyX. I'm maintaining a package that should switch to biblatex soon, the only problem is that we can't offer it our users as a hack that ne

Re: biblatex and Lyx 2.1

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-03-08 17:22 GMT+01:00 Richard Heck : > >>> I probably screwed up the install. How do you make a completely >>> parallel installation of Lyx 2.1 that won't touch the existing 2.0 >>> version either in the local dirs (the ~/.lyx folde

Re: biblatex and Lyx 2.1

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 03/08/2014 11:14 AM, stefano franchi wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> >>> 2014-03-08 16:00 GMT+01:00 stefano franchi: >>> I am trying to convert to 2.1 the test document we will use for the >>

Re: biblatex and Lyx 2.1

2014-03-08 17:22 GMT+01:00 Richard Heck : > I probably screwed up the install. How do you make a completely >> parallel installation of Lyx 2.1 that won't touch the existing 2.0 >> version either in the local dirs (the ~/.lyx folder) and in the global >> tree (all the stuff installed under /usr)?

Re: biblatex and Lyx 2.1

On 03/08/2014 11:14 AM, stefano franchi wrote: On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2014-03-08 16:00 GMT+01:00 stefano franchi: I am trying to convert to 2.1 the test document we will use for the lyx<-->word tests, and I am stuck on biblatex. The biblatex module we have f

Re: biblatex and Lyx 2.1

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2014-03-08 16:00 GMT+01:00 stefano franchi: > >> I am trying to convert to 2.1 the test document we will use for the >> lyx<-->word tests, and I am stuck on biblatex. >> The biblatex module we have for 2.0.* loads natbib: >> >> Format 11

Re: biblatex and Lyx 2.1

2014-03-08 16:00 GMT+01:00 stefano franchi: > I am trying to convert to 2.1 the test document we will use for the > lyx<-->word tests, and I am stuck on biblatex. > The biblatex module we have for 2.0.* loads natbib: > > Format 11 > > # this is biblatex actually > Provides natbib1 > > > Ly

Re: biblatex native support

Richard Heck wrote: > This may be hard and it may be very hard, but it definitely is not > trivial. A lot of the necessary work was done by Julien when he > modularized the citation stuff. That makes it possible to have modules > that declare different citation commands and then to use them in a

Re: biblatex native support

On 12/12/2013 03:50 PM, stefano franchi wrote: On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:59 AM, PhilipPirrip > wrote: Why is it so? How difficult would it be to extend the code for bibtex to biblatex? Could you make this a GSOC project for the next year, at least? Thank y

Re: biblatex native support

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:59 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote: > Why is it so? How difficult would it be to extend the code for bibtex to > biblatex? Could you make this a GSOC project for the next year, at least? > Thank you. > > GSoC for 2014 sounds like a good idea. But my impression (hopefully mistaken

Re: biblatex native support

PhilipPirrip wrote: > Biblatex is so much better than bibtex, yet > there's no native support for it in LyX. Why is it so? Lack of manpower. Regards, Jürgen