Am Mittwoch, dem 31.08.2022 um 13:56 +0100 schrieb madmurphy: > I wanted to use the biblatex-chicago package instead of the plain > biblatex, but it appeared harder to do than I thought. After digging > around a bit I found out that three years ago someone wanted to do > the same. So I have created the biblatex-chicago.citeengine file > (attached), to be put under /usr/share/lyx/citeengines/, and that > solved my problem. But that engine of mine is a “dirty” workaround, > and I feel it could be improved and eventually added to the repo – > but I don't know how to do it.
I has a closer look now. Adding support requires some major effort. For instance, we need to add a proper NOTES cite engine type, and we need to account for the fact that biblatex-chicago loads its styles differently than biblatex. I can have a go at that, but I doubt I will find time before LyX 2.4. -- Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
