Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> | for the records... it wasn't me (I don't make mistakes!)
>
> Oh no... not another one. ;-)
You mean I'm not alone? ;-)
Alfredo
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| for the records... it wasn't me (I don't make mistakes!)
Oh no... not another one. ;-)
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Hm...
>
> Let's blame Alfredo.
stabber
> I nowadays can insert an ordinary character behind a displayed math
> inset, too, so something's fishy there...
for the records... it wasn't me (I don't make mistakes!)
Alfredo
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 04:29:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I think we should get rid of the concept of "inlined" insets.
>
| I don't care too much, but if I were to decide on a direction I'd move
| the other way, i.e. move away from a format
On Monday 27 October 2003 15:42, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:30:41PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > > Looks funny.
> >
> > An weird. :-)
I meant:
And weird. :-)
> Better now.
Ok.
> Andre'
--
José Abílio
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:30:41PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Looks funny.
>
> An weird. :-)
Better now.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 04:29:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think we should get rid of the concept of "inlined" insets.
I don't care too much, but if I were to decide on a direction I'd move
the other way, i.e. move away from a format where newlines are
significant.
> The amount of b
On Monday 27 October 2003 15:26, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I nowadays can insert an ordinary character behind a displayed math
> > inset, too, so something's fishy there...
>
> Hm, it rather looks like the first character on the following row is
> echoed behind a displayed math row.
That happens
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 04:17:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Monday 27 October 2003 15:02, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:55:24PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
>> >> > Hi
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 04:21:12PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:12:15PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > On Monday 27 October 2003 14:55, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > > Hi André,
> > > probably not your doing, but... :-)
> > >
> > > If I insert a new inset horizontal line wh
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 04:17:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Monday 27 October 2003 15:02, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:55:24PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> >> > Hi André,
> >> > probably not your doing, but... :-
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:12:15PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Monday 27 October 2003 14:55, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Hi André,
> > probably not your doing, but... :-)
> >
> > If I insert a new inset horizontal line while playing with it I get:
> >
> > Assertion triggered in void LyXText::
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Monday 27 October 2003 15:02, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:55:24PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
>> > Hi André,
>> >probably not your doing, but... :-)
>>
>> Of course not.
>>
>> But as you are among the living: I'd need some lyx
On Monday 27 October 2003 14:55, Jose' Matos wrote:
Not sure if related but:
I always get the first char of a new line in the previous. Probably already
reported...
This is probably to Alfredo. :-)
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
On Monday 27 October 2003 14:55, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Hi André,
> probably not your doing, but... :-)
>
> If I insert a new inset horizontal line while playing with it I get:
>
> Assertion triggered in void LyXText::setCursor(LyXCursor&, int, int, bool)
> by failing check "par != int(ow
On Monday 27 October 2003 15:02, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:55:24PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Hi André,
> > probably not your doing, but... :-)
>
> Of course not.
>
> But as you are among the living: I'd need some lyx2lyx magic to
> translate pagebreak above/below int
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:55:24PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Hi André,
> probably not your doing, but... :-)
Of course not.
But as you are among the living: I'd need some lyx2lyx magic to
translate pagebreak above/below into a "\newpage\n" before or after
the paragaphh.
> If I inse
17 matches
Mail list logo
