Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 04:17:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Monday 27 October 2003 15:02, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:55:24PM +0000, Jose' Matos wrote:
>> >> > Hi André,
>> >> > probably not your doing, but... :-)
>> >>
>> >> Of course not.
>> >>
>> >> But as you are among the living: I'd need some lyx2lyx magic to
>> >> translate pagebreak above/below into a "\newpage\n" before or after
>> >> the paragaphh.
>> >
>> | If you want I can do it. :-)
>>
>> Is this new InsetNewline output as an inset or not?
>
| You mean Newpage?
>
| As 'inlined inset' like \hfill and \newline.
yes.
Hmm...
I think we should get rid of the concept of "inlined" insets. The
amount of bytes saved is not worth having different methods for this.
Then we could probably get rid of this member. Perhaps others as well.
When we move towards xml it will end up with <inset type="newpage"/>
or something similar.
If we then use
\begin_inset newpage
\end_inset
should imho be just ok.
--
Lgb
