On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:51:07PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Qt3/Win uses the native API.
>
> LyX 1.5 was basically performing the same with both Qt3/Win and Qt4/Win.
So this indicates a change in lyx rathr than Qt.
Andre
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:59:06PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > LyX 1.5 was basically performing the same with both Qt3/Win and Qt4/Win.
> > So, from what you say, its poor performance is related to something that
> > is being done differently with respect to 1.3.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
LyX 1.5 was basically performing the same with both Qt3/Win and Qt4/Win.
So, from what you say, its poor performance is related to something that
is being done differently with respect to 1.3. Indeed, even using Qt/X11,
scrolling of the document attached to bug 2900 is di
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:01:06PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:21:41PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > >>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:01:06PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:21:41PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > >>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > >>> I thought Abdel tested that with qt4.
> > >
>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:58:01AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Enrico> I have always stated that LyX/Qt/X11 is more snappy than
> Enrico> LyX/Qt/Win. But this is true for 1.4, as LyX 1.3, using the
> Enrico> same Qt/Win ver
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> I would more correctly say that it is a problem with the Qt
Enrico> library implemented directly using the Windows API, as the Qt
Enrico> library which goes through the X11 API does not have this
Enrico> problem, even if it ru
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:21:41PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>> I thought Abdel tested that with qt4.
> >
> >Abdelrazak> LyX-1.4/qt3 behaves exactly the same with this file.
> >
> >So th
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:05:03AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> I doubt it. LyX/Qt3/X11 on Windows (Cygwin, really) performs
> Enrico> exactly the same as on *nix, so this is something specifically
> Enrico> relate
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I thought Abdel tested that with qt4.
Abdelrazak> LyX-1.4/qt3 behaves exactly the same with this file.
So this is a general problem with lyx-qt on windows, right?
I would rather say with lyx-mathed
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I thought Abdel tested that with qt4.
Abdelrazak> LyX-1.4/qt3 behaves exactly the same with this file.
So this is a general problem with lyx-qt on windows, right?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> I doubt it. LyX/Qt3/X11 on Windows (Cygwin, really) performs
Enrico> exactly the same as on *nix, so this is something specifically
Enrico> related to Qt3/Win.
Enrico> Yes, that file is still impossib
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> I doubt it. LyX/Qt3/X11 on Windows (Cygwin, really) performs
Enrico> exactly the same as on *nix, so this is something specifically
Enrico> related to Qt3/Win.
Enrico> Yes, that file is still impossible to manage in LyX/Qt3/W
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:48:09AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
> Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any faster, thank you very much.
>
> Did you look at t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any faster, thank yo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any faster, thank you very much.
Did you look at the file in bug 2900? This is a slowdown with math
insets
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I don't know about linux and MacOS but I personally don't
Abdelrazak> need LyX to be any faster, thank you very much.
Did you look at the file in bug 2900? This is a slowdown with math
insets that is peculiar to windo
18 matches
Mail list logo