Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Christian Ridderström wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: PS: I am beginning a new job so I have very little time to give to LyX unfortunately. Congratulations! Thanks Christian. Abdel.

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: PS: I am beginning a new job so I have very little time to give to LyX unfortunately. Congratulations! /Christian -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44http://www.md.kth.se/~chr

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 14:15:01 Konrad Hofbauer wrote: >  >> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5387 > > Works. OK, so this can go in. -- José Abílio

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
José Matos wrote: > If someone (other than you ;-) ) can confirm that they work and since Adbel > did not found anything wrong with the code this can go in. I can reproduce both bugs (on Mac), I tested the two patches both individually and jointly. >> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 10:56:06 Stefan Schimanski wrote: > Looking at the calender makes me wonder about the plan for tomorrow. > > I am waiting for a comment on two patches which I would like to see in   > 1.6.0. Especially 5387 is really annoying on Mac right now: If someone (other than y

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Stefan Schimanski wrote: > either with or without both patches i dont see any difference when processing the recipies you gave (linux, Xfe file manager). pavel

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Stefan Schimanski
Am 05.11.2008 um 12:37 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stefan Schimanski wrote: In any case I suggest that you decide yourself how to proceed as only you can properly test this thing (provided that this doesn't impact the other platforms of course. I don't think there is any impact on other systems

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Konrad Hofbauer
Stefan Schimanski wrote: I am waiting for a comment on two patches which I would like to see in 1.6.0. Especially 5387 is really annoying on Mac right now: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5447 http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5387 I can offer to test the two patches, if that is

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Stefan Schimanski wrote: >> In any case I suggest that you decide yourself how to proceed as only you >> can properly test this thing (provided that this doesn't impact the other >> platforms of course. > > I don't think there is any impact on other systems. But again only testing > can tell us.

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Stefan Schimanski
Am 05.11.2008 um 12:15 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: Stefan Schimanski wrote: Looking at the calender makes me wonder about the plan for tomorrow. I am waiting for a comment on two patches which I would like to see in 1.6.0. Especially 5387 is really annoying on Mac right now: http://bugzilla.

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Stefan Schimanski wrote: Looking at the calender makes me wonder about the plan for tomorrow. I am waiting for a comment on two patches which I would like to see in 1.6.0. Especially 5387 is really annoying on Mac right now: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5447 http://bugzilla.lyx.org

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Stefan Schimanski wrote: Looking at the calender makes me wonder about the plan for tomorrow. I am waiting for a comment on two patches which I would like to see in 1.6.0. Especially 5387 is really annoying on Mac right now: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5447 http://bugzilla.lyx.org

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-11-05 Thread Stefan Schimanski
Looking at the calender makes me wonder about the plan for tomorrow. I am waiting for a comment on two patches which I would like to see in 1.6.0. Especially 5387 is really annoying on Mac right now: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5447 http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5387 St

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-10-30 Thread rgheck
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > None of the other bugs seem to me particularly crucial, This might be the case for the crash bugs, but there are still some very annoying regressions. Yes, I meant the crash bugs. - Take for example bug 4398 that prevents that LyX 1.5.6 UserGuide cannot be compiled with

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-10-29 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> None of the other bugs seem to me particularly crucial, This might be the case for the crash bugs, but there are still some very annoying regressions. - Take for example bug 4398 that prevents that LyX 1.5.6 UserGuide cannot be compiled with LyX 1.6. - Bug 5429 is also annoying - Bug 5407 is

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-10-29 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: >> Reusing Uwe's short links we have: >> list of current regressions: http://tinyurl.com/yu4the >> list of current crashes and critical bugs: http://tinyurl.com/653prg >> >> > 1474 may never be resolved, but what's left of it isn't really that > important, I don't

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-10-29 Thread rgheck
José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 29 October 2008 18:26:01 Pavel Sanda wrote: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule Reusing Uwe's short links we have: list of current regressions: http://tinyurl.com/yu4the list of current crashes and critical bugs: http://tinyurl.com/653prg

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-10-29 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 18:26:01 Pavel Sanda wrote: > http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule Reusing Uwe's short links we have: list of current regressions: http://tinyurl.com/yu4the list of current crashes and critical bugs: http://tinyurl.com/653prg The problem now is to decid

Re: 1.6 schedule

2008-10-29 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: > > What's the current plan as to further developments? http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule pavel