On Thursday 13 July 2006 18:56, Bo Peng wrote:
> Didn't I said that normal windows users do not read any instruction or
> documentations :-)
Could you please remove the word windows there, the sentence is still true
without it. ;-)
> Bo
--
José Abílio
On 7/13/06, Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
> The installer recognizes miktex after I gave it the path. It might be
> helpful to say "enter the path to latex.exe" though, since I provided
> c:\texmf first.
It says exactly that :)
Didn't I said that normal windows users
Bo Peng wrote:
The installer recognizes miktex after I gave it the path. It might be
helpful to say "enter the path to latex.exe" though, since I provided
c:\texmf first.
It says exactly that :)
Joost
This means that the MiKTeX registry key is missing. Did you install
MiKTeX using the standard installer? You can of course locate it manually.
I think (I am not quite sure) that I installed miktex separately,
using the standard installer.
The installer recognizes miktex after I gave it the path
Bo Peng wrote:
When I upgrade from 1.4.2svn to 1.4.2-1: the installer does not
recognize my miktex installation in c:\texmf. It recognized all other
components though.
This means that the MiKTeX registry key is missing. Did you install
MiKTeX using the standard installer? You can of course loc
