On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:37:08AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 16.12.2017 a las 20:10, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
>
> > It's fine for 2.3.0.
>
> OK, I'll put it in.
>
> > Usually what I do when changing http to https is to
> > check that the https link is indeed secure.
>
> This is what I did.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 01:36:59AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 17.12.2017 a las 01:37, Uwe Stöhr escribió:
>
> > El 16.12.2017 a las 20:10, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
> >
> > > It's fine for 2.3.0.
> >
> > OK, I'll put it in.
>
> OK, I rethought this. I fear special cases in lyx2lyx or tex2lyx
El 17.12.2017 a las 01:37, Uwe Stöhr escribió:
El 16.12.2017 a las 20:10, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
It's fine for 2.3.0.
OK, I'll put it in.
OK, I rethought this. I fear special cases in lyx2lyx or tex2lyx where I
might have missed a thing. Then they might not work correctly just
because
El 16.12.2017 a las 20:10, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
It's fine for 2.3.0.
OK, I'll put it in.
Usually what I do when changing http to https is to
check that the https link is indeed secure.
This is what I did. if it is not secure I left it with http. While doing
this I detected a lot of b
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:22:13PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I think we should use https wherever possible:
> https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10945
> Attached is a patch that does this.
> OK to go in?
>
> What about LyX 2.3, should we do this there as well or can this be done for
> 2.3.1?
It's fi
