On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:54:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Do you see any reason for this linear 'index' numbering of
> Andre> cells? [I do not really want to touch it now, but I have the
> Andre> impression that the current code is a bit more complex that it
> Andre> would be w
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Do you see any reason for this linear 'index' numbering of
Andre> cells? [I do not really want to touch it now, but I have the
Andre> impression that the current code is a bit more complex that it
Andre> would be with a simple row/c
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:40:33PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Looks ok to me.
Fine.
As you were moving in that direction:
Do you see any reason for this linear 'index' numbering of cells?
[I do not really want to touch it now, but I have the impression that the
current code is a bit mor
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:29:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:25:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > - Read(buf, lex);
> > + read(buf, lex);
>
> Perhaps confusing it with InsetTabular::read(), but I think there are
> two versions of read: read() and Read().
I do
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Mostly renaming SomeFunctions() to someFunctions(),
| various issues with whitespace and excessive use of parantheses
| and some public->private.
|
| No user visible change.
Looks ok to me.
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Mostly renaming SomeFunctions() to someFunctions(),
The exact thing that I planned to do now.
| various issues with whitespace and excessive use of parantheses
| and some public->private.
|
| No user visible change.
Let me have a quick look.
--
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:25:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> - Read(buf, lex);
> + read(buf, lex);
Perhaps confusing it with InsetTabular::read(), but I think there are
two versions of read: read() and Read().
If not, please ignore me.
So, you are tabular maintainer now right ? >:)
