On Sunday 11 January 2009 03:49:53 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Python 2.6 changes a lot and was released to make it easier to switch to
> Python 3. Python 2.6 is compatible to Python 2.5 and to Python 3.0.
python 2.6 is not compatible with python 3.0, one of the most flagrant
examples is print that is a s
Anders Ekberg schrieb:
That's not entirely the case either. See the last section of:
http://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html ...
However, there are a lot of persons who knows much more about this than
me (José!).
Yes, and therefore I shut up now before I'm talking something wrong.
Never
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Actually, because we distribute a version of Python under window and
python 2.x will stay on any *nix system for very long time. I do not
see a need to upgrade our script to Python 3.0 right now.
Why are you sure that python 2.x will stay on
On 11 jan 2009, at 14.40, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> i know nothing about the problem, but it is not possible to have
scripts which
> work with both 2.5 and 3 versions
No, and that is the problem. The only version that is compatible to
both versions is Python 2.6.x.
That's not entirely the case e
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > i know nothing about the problem, but it is not possible to have scripts
> which
> > work with both 2.5 and 3 versions
>
> No, and that is the problem.
i still cant believe this is a bad joke ;) how often do the python guys change
the language definition in such an incompatib
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Actually, because we distribute a version of Python under window and
> > python 2.x will stay on any *nix system for very long time. I do not
> > see a need to upgrade our script to Python 3.0 right now.
>
> Why are you sure that python 2.x will stay on any *nix system for very
> i know nothing about the problem, but it is not possible to have scripts which
> work with both 2.5 and 3 versions
No, and that is the problem. The only version that is compatible to both
versions is Python 2.6.x.
I think we can wait, but when the first distribution ships Python 3.0 as default
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Actually, because we distribute a version of Python under window and
>> python 2.x will stay on any *nix system for very long time. I do not
>> see a need to upgrade our script to Python 3.0 right now.
>
> Why are you sure that python 2.x will stay on any *nix system for very lo
Bo Peng schrieb:
I started with the SCons script and need the attached patch to get it
running.
Bo, can this go in or do you want to change more (comments etc.)?
You mean scons already supports Python 3.0?
I use SCons 1.2 and this works with Python 3.
Actually, because we distribute a vers
> I started with the SCons script and need the attached patch to get it
> running.
> Bo, can this go in or do you want to change more (comments etc.)?
You mean scons already supports Python 3.0?
Actually, because we distribute a version of Python under window and
python 2.x will stay on any *nix
10 matches
Mail list logo
