On Monday 07 May 2007 20:38:19 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I just noticed, that this is not specially the case for Armenian but also
> applies for the CJK-languages.
>
> So I currently see no special Armenian bug.
OK.
> regards Uwe
--
José Abílio
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
From Georg's list with his complaints there is only one left I think:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3569
(Perhaps somebody has idea about the from encoding of the "," problem I
described there.)
I just noticed, that this is not specially the case for Armenian but
> With the inclusion of yesterday patch, 3043 I think, the situation has
> improved by addressing Georg's concerns.
Yes it has. I now also fixed the babel call (bug 3568).
I again tested that everything works as expected with the
"armenian-article.lyx" from the examples.
If problems will arise
On Monday 07 May 2007 17:40:21 Michael Gerz wrote:
> No response... IOW we keep it, right?José?
With the inclusion of yesterday patch, 3043 I think, the situation has
improved by addressing Georg's concerns.
I would like to see the possible problems found during the discussion
documented. (B
Michael Gerz schrieb:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
The biggest quirk I see is that armenian support without having been
requested and without input from anybody who understands/needs it
(correct me if I am wrong). This is a big error IMO.
At the risk of making Uwe very, very angry: Should
José Matos schrieb:
I am proposing the removal of the official support for Armenian from 1.5.
I tend to agree.
Michael
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
The biggest quirk I see is that armenian support without having been
requested and without input from anybody who understands/needs it
(correct me if I am wrong). This is a big error IMO.
At the risk of making Uwe very, very angry: Should we revert the changes?
On Friday 04 May 2007 11:13:52 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The biggest quirk I see is that armenian support without having been
> requested and without input from anybody who understands/needs it
> (correct me if I am wrong). This is a big error IMO.
I agree.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 02:55:07 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Of course but nobody replied to this topic and your first statement was:
> Commit it.
I am sorry but what said was:
> Do you have an OK from Georg? If yes then please commit if not I would
> like to hear from him. (Hi Georg!) :-)
There is
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> I know that the current state is OK for you and I respect that.
Georg> But since Jose asked for quirks and you did only mention one I
Georg> felt the need to list the others. That does not mean that any
Georg> of these needs to be fixe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >> Are there any quirks in the support for Armenian? If there are
> >> please
> >> document that somewhere so that we can point people to the right
> >> place.
>
> > Uwe, why did you not answer this question? I am doing that now, because
> > I think that the quirks sh
Michael Gerz schrieb:
How many Armenian users are going to use 1.5.x BTW?
Nobody yet of course. But I'm sure some months after Lyx 1.5.0 is out, people will start using this.
It always takes some time until potential users get the info that a new program/feature is available.
I don't unders
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
Btw. I think we currently don't have an Armenian user, so why would
somebody have it working in LyX 1.4.x?
How many Armenian users are going to use 1.5.x BTW?
I don't understand why you spent so much effort into this matter...
don't tell me that you read+write Armenian, do y
>> Are there any quirks in the support for Armenian? If there are please
>> document that somewhere so that we can point people to the right place.
> Uwe, why did you not answer this question? I am doing that now, because I
> think that the quirks should be known.
I explained the quirks I saw.
Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2007 00:04 schrieb José Matos:
> Are there any quirks in the support for Armenian? If there are please
> document that somewhere so that we can point people to the right place.
Uwe, why did you not answer this question? I am doing that now, because I
think that the quirks
> Second we should weight the pros and cons of design decisions we take. That
> is why the discussion in the mailing list is important, the first and
> quickest solution generally is not the best, the process is iterative.
Of course but nobody replied to this topic and your first statement was: C
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 18:34:14 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >> Do you have an OK from Georg?
> >
> > Not fully yet. We discussed several things in private mail and I sent
> > him also my latest patch.
>
> Georg helped me to fix the remaining issus. But in general he don't want
> such language supports.
>> Do you have an OK from Georg?
>
> Not fully yet. We discussed several things in private mail and I sent him also
> my latest patch.
Georg helped me to fix the remaining issus. But in general he don't want such language supports. I
understand that he prefers a solution where the user can just
> Do you have an OK from Georg?
Not fully yet. We discussed several things in private mail and I sent him also
my latest patch.
Absolutely perfect support for Armenian isn't possible due to the structure of
the ArmTeX-package.
When somebody could finish the patch attached to bug 3043
http://bu
On Sunday 29 April 2007 13:47:59 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> OK to go in?
Do you have an OK from Georg? If yes then please commit if not I would like
to hear from him. (Hi Georg!) :-)
I am asking about Georg because most of this implementation is his work and
so he is the most qualified developer to
I forgot to revert also the new encoding, attached is a better patch to
LyX_1_5.py
regards Uwe
Index: lyx_1_5.py
===
--- lyx_1_5.py (revision 18079)
+++ lyx_1_5.py (working copy)
@@ -1283,6 +1283,36 @@
i = i + 1
+def re
Now also with attached patch.
Index: development/FORMAT
===
--- development/FORMAT (revision 18079)
+++ development/FORMAT (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
LyX file-format changes
---
+2007-04-29 Uwe Stöhr <[
22 matches
Mail list logo
