On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:25:32AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > Shrug shrug. How do you test a thing like this? I ran LyX to produce
> > both a LaTeX file and a PDF, and nothing untoward seemed to happen.
> > Both files look OK.
> >
> > So I'll just check this in then, right? Any other o
On Thursday 27 November 2003 7:33 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:02:14PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > > Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be)
> >
> > Shrug. I don't know. I'm just an ignorant old bloke with a headache ;-)
>
> Shrug sh
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:02:14PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> >
> > Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be)
>
> Shrug. I don't know. I'm just an ignorant old bloke with a headache ;-)
Shrug shrug. How do you test a thing like this? I ran LyX to produce
both
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 8:01 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Something like this?
> >
> > Something like that yes. Although we can convert to pdf by way of the
> > latex compiler so OutputParams::PDFLATEX would be wrong in that case (try
> > running png images through latex ;-)
> >
> > Angus
> > Something like this?
>
> Something like that yes. Although we can convert to pdf by way of the latex
> compiler so OutputParams::PDFLATEX would be wrong in that case (try running
> png images through latex ;-)
>
> Angus
Eh? But isn't this patch functionally neutral? (I intended it to be)
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 5:54 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Meaning what?
> >
> > Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
> >
> > > A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
> >
> > Nice idea
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Meaning what?
>
> Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
>
> > A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
>
> Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
>
> --
> Angus
Something like
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:18:54AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Meaning what?
>
> Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
>
> > A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
>
> Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
It will once we have more than t
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Meaning what?
Meaning that I'm getting old and grumpy.
> A routine FLAVOR Converters::getFlavor() ?
Nice idea actually. Will it lead to cleaner code?
--
Angus
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 20:28, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> > Does that mean adding a method makeXml(), analoguous to
> > usePdflatex() in Converters?
>
> Yuck! Nothing personal, but I'd rather see Alfredo's 'flavours'
> maturing into some real code.
So we do. I am still waiting since last mee
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 19:00, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:00:25PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> > With all the cleaning your cleaning going on I am tempted to rename
> > docbook to SGML and the make docbook as an instance of that. :-)
> >
> > The support for xml
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:28:46PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >> The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
> >> This will add
> >>
> >> in the begin and take care of specific xml details inside.
> >
> > Does that mean adding a method makeXml()
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Yuck! Nothing personal, but I'd rather see Alfredo's 'flavours'
> maturing into some real code.
>
> Ahh well, given that Christmas is still some time off, I guess that
> I'll have to wait for my presents.
I don't know if Santa is subscribed to this list, though ;-)
Alfre
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
>> This will add
>>
>> in the begin and take care of specific xml details inside.
>
> Does that mean adding a method makeXml(), analoguous to
> usePdflatex() in Converters?
Yuck! Nothing personal, but I'd rather
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:00:25PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> With all the cleaning your cleaning going on I am tempted to rename docbook
> to SGML and the make docbook as an instance of that. :-)
>
> The support for xml can be done with the flavour dialect.
> This will add
>
> in
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:50:51AM +0100, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:01:44AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > But, just to make my position clear: I am very happy that you are
> > doing this, it is certainly a part in LyX that needs work. However I
> > am afraid
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:01:44AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> | Lars,
> >
> | any news on this one?
>
> I just never have the time to do the read-thru or the think-thru... so
> if others have no problems with this you should probably just apply
> it.
>
> But, just to make my posi
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:01:44AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But, just to make my position clear: I am very happy that you are
> doing this, it is certainly a part in LyX that needs work. However I
> am afraid that this work, instead of unifying LaTeX and XML support,
> just shifts the su
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | [x] after a thourough read-thru
>>
>> --
>> Lgb
>
| Lars,
>
| any news on this one?
I just never have the time to do the read-thru or the think-thru... so
if others have no problems with this you should probably just apply
it.
But, just to m
> | [x] after a thourough read-thru
>
> --
> Lgb
Lars,
any news on this one?
- Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:39:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> | [x] after a thourough read-thru
Lars,
sorry to provide you with a moving target, but here is the further
improved version of the 'XML tags' patch.
Here you only have to look at the counters stuff, which is what has
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:39:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | (Surely paragraph numbering could be of use on the LaTeX side too? Are
> | there any documentclasses with numbered paragraphs?)
>
> All... and that is controlled by the
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (Surely paragraph numbering could be of use on the LaTeX side too? Are
| there any documentclasses with numbered paragraphs?)
All... and that is controlled by the "numbering depth"
>
| Lars, can this go in
>
| [ ] as such
| [ ] with or
| [ ] withou
Here's the evolved version. I added the feature of ID labels (counter
based) including paragraph ID labels, which are REQUIRED for AGU.
(Surely paragraph numbering could be of use on the LaTeX side too? Are
there any documentclasses with numbered paragraphs?)
...and general polish and improved co
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 15:29, Martin Vermeer wrote:
One of the problems with Martin's messages is that you need to think a bit
about them. ;-)
[...]
> You see, the main difference between LaTeX and XML is, that while
> LaTeX is a (one!) mark-up language, XML is a meta-language or
> 'la
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:12:31AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> | Does this more clearly illustrate the idea?
> >
> | Check-in later today, shout to object ;-)
>
> Object!
>
> I am all for cleaning up and parametization. But I am
> Generically:
>
> \begin{LatexName}
>
> item text for itemize/enum
>label_textitem text for description
>...
>
> \end{LatexName}
No, that would be
\begin{LatexName}
item text for itemize/enum
...
label_textitem text for description
...
\end{LatexName}
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:12:31AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:16:57PM +0200, Martin Vermeer spake thusly:
> |
> >> My primary objective with this is to parametrize the docbook list code
> >> by moving
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:16:57PM +0200, Martin Vermeer spake thusly:
|
>> My primary objective with this is to parametrize the docbook list code
>> by moving stuff from LyX to the .layout files. (Yes, this makes them a
>> little messier looking righ
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:16:57PM +0200, Martin Vermeer spake thusly:
> My primary objective with this is to parametrize the docbook list code
> by moving stuff from LyX to the .layout files. (Yes, this makes them a
> little messier looking right now. Doesn't bother the end user nor the
> LaTeX
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 07:30:44PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> On Monday 17 November 2003 16:56, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Attached. Work in progress, but getting better... more logical now and
> > more parametrized.
>
> That is true.
>
> > If everybody thinks this is going in the righ
On Monday 17 November 2003 16:56, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Attached. Work in progress, but getting better... more logical now and
> more parametrized.
That is true.
> If everybody thinks this is going in the right direction, I'll put it
> in tomorrow.
But I don't know if this is the right dir
32 matches
Mail list logo
